Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Nigde Omer Halisdemir University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of current subgingival debridement methods used in the treatment of Stage 1 and Stage 2 periodontitis patients, the aesthetic condition achieved after these treatments, and the pain felt during treatment.
90 female patients who were diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (Stage 1-2) and required supra-subgingival scaling for treatment purposes, and who volunteered to participate in the study, were included in the study. Three treatment groups were determined. 30 people were included in each group. Periodontal examination was performed before and after the treatments in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month and the data on the collected periodontal parameters were analyzed.
Periodontal parametreler Gingival index, plaque index, periodontal pocket depth and bleeding index on probing.
It was evaluated with the visual analog scale for pain and aesthetics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1- classic treatment | Subgingival debridement was performed using the Cavitron and Gracey curette (this is the method that is used routinely). | ||
| Group 2-Guided Biofilm Therapy | Subgingival debridement was performed with the Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT+Airabrasion) method. This method is the most up-to-date method. The biofilm is shown to the patient with plate dye, and the biofilm is cleaned with air abrasion and perio flow (EMS device cavitron). In the patient's control sessions, the patient's oral hygiene motivation is tried to be increased by dyeing the biofilm. | ||
| Group 3- Classical treatment and with Plaque paint | the dental calculus and biofilm were stained with plaque paint, shown to the patient with the help of a mirror, and then routine subgingival debridement was performed. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gingival index | 4 surfaces of all teeth (distal, buccal, mesial, lingual) are evaluated 0= Normal gingiva
| baseline, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
90 female patients with stage 1-2 periodontitis
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nigde Omer Halisdemir University | Niğde | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010518 | Periodontitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided