Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective observational diagnostic study will be conducted to assess the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in verifying the correct nasogastric tube placement, using X-ray as the reference standard.
This study is a prospective observational diagnostic investigation aimed at evaluating the accuracy of ultrasound in confirming nasogastric tube (NGT) placement. Participants aged 18 years or older requiring NGT insertion will be recruited via convenience sampling from community nursing centres across five clusters and medical and geriatric wards in four acute or convalescent hospitals. Nurses performing index tests will complete standardized POCUS training (8-hour theory and practical sessions, written exams, 3-month bedside practicum with ≥20 positive scans) prior to competency assessment. Direct visualisation of an NGT in both the oesophagus and stomach will be interpreted as correct stomach placement. When the acoustic shadow of an NGT was not seen in the stomach, 50cc of air was injected through the NGT, and it was considered well-placed if the ultrasonography showed dynamic fogging. Correct gastric placement is assumed if the acoustic shadow of an NGT is visible in the oesophagus and stomach, even if fogging is not detectable. The reference standard will be post-index test X-ray confirmation. Diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios, will be calculated to assess the efficacy of ultrasound. Variability in diagnostic accuracy across participant characteristics will be analyzed. Additionally, the study will compare the time intervals between ultrasound and X-ray, delays in feeding initiation post-placement, and associated costs, including emergency department admissions, unplanned hospitalizations, and ambulance transportation.
The findings will provide critical evidence on the diagnostic utility of ultrasound for NGT placement verification, informing potential revisions to clinical practice guidelines and supporting stakeholder decisions on integrating ultrasound as a reference test.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observational Group | All participants included will be in one observational cohort. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic ultrasound | Device | A portable wireless ultrasound system (Vscan Air, General Electric Healthcare) with dual probes-linear array (3-12 MHz) for neck scanning and curved array (2-5 MHz) for subxiphoid scanning-will be used. The linear probe is placed transversely on the anterior neck, slid left at the thyroid level to focus on the esophagus, then rotated for longitudinal views. The curved probe is applied subxiphoid, using the liver as a landmark, and tilted left to image the stomach. A positive result is confirmed by visualizing the NGT shadow in the esophagus and stomach, followed by dynamic upsurge fogging after injecting 50cc of air. Ultrasonography and X-ray results will be compared. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in correct Nasogastric Tube placement confirmation | Sensitivity: True Positive / (True Positive + False Negative) x 100% Specificity: True Negative / (True Negative + False Positive) x 100% Positive Predictive Value: True Positive / (True Positive + False Positive) x 100% Negative Predictive Value: True Negative / (True Negative + False Negative) x 100% Positive Likelihood Ratio: sensitivity / 1 - specificity Negative Likelihood Ratio: 1 - sensitivity / specificity | An average of 18 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time lag between USG & x-ray | The study will assess the time lag between ultrasound confirmation and subsequent X-ray imaging for nasogastric tube placement verification. | An average of 18 months |
| Delay between tube placement and feeding by x-ray |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Convenience sampling will be adopted in this study. Participants will be recruited from six community nursing centres in Hong Kong East, Hong Kong West, Kowloon Central, Kowloon West, and New Territories West Cluster hospitals, as well as 38 wards from medical and geriatric wards across 4 acute, rehabilitation or convalescent hospitals managed by the Hospital Authority. Participants will be engaged by episodes throughout the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Authority, HKSAR | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26511519 | Background | Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527. | |
| 28298944 |
Not provided
Not provided
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study will be made available by the principal investigator upon reasonable request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| D011859 | Radiography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Diagnostic X-ray | Device | This study will employ chest radiography as the reference standard for verification of correct nasogastric tube placement. Radiographic imaging will be conducted following NGT insertion and interpreted by physicians to verify positional accuracy. |
|
The study will evaluate the delay between nasogastric tube placement and the initiation of feeding, as confirmed by X-ray.
| An average of 18 months |
| Cost of ED admission, unplanned admission, ambulance transportation | The study will analyze costs associated with Emergency Department admissions, unplanned hospital admissions, and ambulance transportation related to nasogastric tube placement confirmation. | An average of 18 months |
| Zatelli M, Vezzali N. 4-Point ultrasonography to confirm the correct position of the nasogastric tube in 114 critically ill patients. J Ultrasound. 2016 Oct 28;20(1):53-58. doi: 10.1007/s40477-016-0219-0. eCollection 2017 Mar. |
| 28038826 | Background | Wong KW, Chan HH, Wong CP, Chan MY, Chau JCW, Wong TW. Using color flow detection of air insufflation to improve accuracy in verifying nasogastric tube position. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;35(2):333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.046. Epub 2016 Dec 21. |
| 39051488 | Background | Tsujimoto Y, Kataoka Y, Banno M, Anan K, Shiroshita A, Jujo S. Ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 25;7(7):CD012083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012083.pub3. |
| 28828174 | Background | Nedel WL, Jost MNF, Filho JWF. A simple and fast ultrasonographic method of detecting enteral feeding tube placement in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. J Intensive Care. 2017 Aug 18;5:55. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0249-5. eCollection 2017. |
| 33545162 | Background | Mumoli N, Vitale J, Pagnamenta A, Mastroiacovo D, Cei M, Pomero F, Giorgi-Pierfranceschi M, Giuntini L, Porta C, Capra R, Mazzone A, Dentali F. Bedside Abdominal Ultrasound in Evaluating Nasogastric Tube Placement: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study. Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2366-2372. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Feb 2. |
| 34120804 | Background | McMullen CD, Anstey C, Garrett P, Moore J. Nasogastric tube placement under sonographic observation: A comparison study of ultrasound and chest radiography in mechanically ventilated patients. Aust Crit Care. 2022 Mar;35(2):181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Jun 11. |
| 32614666 | Background | Mak MY, Tam G. Ultrasonography for nasogastric tube placement verification: an additional reference. Br J Community Nurs. 2020 Jul 2;25(7):328-334. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.7.328. |
| 28359986 | Background | Lin T, Gifford W, Lan Y, Qin X, Liu X, Wang J, Yang B, You T, Chen K. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for detecting nasogastric tube (NGT) placement in adults: A systematic review and meta analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 9. |
| 25616518 | Background | Gok F, Kilicaslan A, Yosunkaya A. Ultrasound-guided nasogastric feeding tube placement in critical care patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;30(2):257-60. doi: 10.1177/0884533614567714. Epub 2015 Jan 23. |
| 25181712 | Background | Brun PM, Chenaitia H, Lablanche C, Pradel AL, Deniel C, Bessereau J, Melaine R. 2-point ultrasonography to confirm correct position of the gastric tube in prehospital setting. Mil Med. 2014 Sep;179(9):959-63. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00044. |