Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is aiming to characterize the elasticity of the female reproductive tract including the uterus, cervix and ovary using shear wave elastography at different times during the menstrual cycle and define the standard reference range of normal uterine and ovarian elasticity. By doing so, the potential of using shear wave elastography to diagnose and predict outcomes for patients seeking fertility treatment might be established.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nulliparous Women with No Known infertility | Female patients with normal menstrual cycles, normal ovarian and uterine anatomy and with no known prior pregnancy (including miscarriages, terminations, ectopic pregnancies, preterm and full term deliveries) | ||
| Gravid Women with No Known infertility | Female patients with normal menstrual cycles, normal ovarian and uterine anatomy with at least one prior full term vaginal delivery with no known infertility | ||
| Primary Infertile Women Without Uterine Factor Infertility | Female patients with normal menstrual cycles, normal ovarian and uterine anatomy and with no known prior pregnancy (including miscarriages, terminations, ectopic pregnancies, preterm and full term deliveries) that has been diagnosed with primary infertility |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shear wave elastography measurements | Device | Shear wave elastography measurements in kilopascals via ultrasound |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Shear wave elastography parameters | shear wave elastography measurements in kilopascals | 3-4 months from enrollment |
Not provided
Not provided
Group A
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Group B
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Group C
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Nulliparous women with no known infertility, gravid women with no known infertility and primary infertile women without uterine factor infertility
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Zuckerman, BS, BSN, RN | Contact | 9736562841 | clinicalresearchteam@ivirma.com | |
| Christine Whitehead, MS, BSN, RN | Contact | 9736562841 | clinicalresearchteam@ivirma.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMA | Recruiting | Basking Ridge | New Jersey | 07920 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 6. https://www.sart.org/patients/a-patients-guide-to-assisted-reproductive-technology/general-information/success-rates/ | ||
| 33645765 | Background | Vora Z, Manchanda S, Sharma R, Das CJ, Hari S, Mathur S, Kumar S, Kachhawa G, Khan MA. Transvaginal Shear Wave Elastography for Assessment of Endometrial and Subendometrial Pathologies: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jan;41(1):61-70. doi: 10.1002/jum.15679. Epub 2021 Mar 1. | |
| 34049726 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007246 | Infertility |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
blood samples obtained from participants
| Background |
| Shao J, Shi G, Qi Z, Zheng J, Chen S. Advancements in the Application of Ultrasound Elastography in the Cervix. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Aug;47(8):2048-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 May 26. |
| 29790217 | Background | Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;53(5):576-582. doi: 10.1002/uog.19096. No abstract available. |
| 24840338 | Background | Soliman AA, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Ultrasonographic examination of the endometrium and myometrium using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging technology: An initial experience with a new method. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2015;59(3):235-43. doi: 10.3233/CH-141842. |
| 34254413 | Background | Kabukcu C, Cabus U, Oztekin O, Fenkci V. The strain rate of endometrium measured by real-time sonoelastography as a predictive marker for pregnancy in gonadotropin stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Oct;47(10):3561-3570. doi: 10.1111/jog.14921. Epub 2021 Jul 12. |
| 26880060 | Background | Batur A, Yavuz A, Ozgokce M, Bora A, Bulut MD, Arslan H, Alpaslan M. The utility of ultrasound elastography in differentiation of endometriomas and hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2016 Jul;43(3):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s10396-016-0701-5. Epub 2016 Feb 15. |
| 28283264 | Background | Swierkowski-Blanchard N, Boitrelle F, Alter L, Selva J, Quibel T, Torre A. Uterine contractility and elastography as prognostic factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):961-968.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 7. |
| 32484092 | Background | Altunkeser A, Inal ZO, Baran N. Evaluation of Ovaries in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome using Shear Wave Elastography. Curr Med Imaging. 2020;16(5):578-583. doi: 10.2174/1573405615666190114150538. |
| 10548635 | Background | Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Casan EM, Klein O, Bonilla F. Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;14(11):2851-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2851. |
| 38656810 | Background | Barrett F, Willson S, Werner M. Advancements in the application of uterine ultrasound elastography. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun 1;36(3):181-185. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000949. Epub 2024 Mar 26. |
| 30299431 | Background | Hawkins Bressler L, Steiner A. Anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictor of reproductive potential. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2018 Dec;25(6):385-390. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000440. |
| 38609185 | Background | Zaniker EJ, Zhang M, Hughes L, La Follette L, Atazhanova T, Trofimchuk A, Babayev E, Duncan FE. Shear wave elastography to assess stiffness of the human ovary and other reproductive tissues across the reproductive lifespan in health and diseasedagger. Biol Reprod. 2024 Jun 12;110(6):1100-1114. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioae050. |
| 35100616 | Background | Cedars MI. Evaluation of Female Fertility-AMH and Ovarian Reserve Testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 May 17;107(6):1510-1519. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac039. |
| 23731996 | Background | Scott RT Jr, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, Tao X, Treff NR. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jun 1. |
| 22305103 | Background | Scott RT Jr, Ferry K, Su J, Tao X, Scott K, Treff NR. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):870-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.104. Epub 2012 Feb 2. |