Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of complete (preservation of both anterior and posterior leaflets) versus partial (preservation of posterior leaflet only) preservation of subvalvular apparatus in cases of mitral valve replacement
After mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular-chordal-papillary-left-ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period.
patients with LV dysfunction after MVR have a significantly lower 8-year survival rate compares with patients who did not have LV dysfunction Papillary muscles play an important role in the left ventricular contraction by drawing the mitral ring toward the apex, thereby causing shortening of the long axis and spherity of the chamber contribute for better ejection of blood.
preservation of papillary muscles and chordae tendineae in MVR reduces postoperative mortality, low cardiac output syndrome and improves haemodynamic function.
Partial preservation of the mitral apparatus through preservation of the posterior leaflet (MVR-P) has been proven to significantly reduce perioperative mortality.
The importance of complete preservation of the mitral apparatus remains controversial, but it is hypothesized that complete preservation with preservation of both the anterior and posterior leaflets may contribute to superior postoperative hemodynamic function as compared to partial preservation.
Due to the increased technical complexity of preserving both leaflets, concerns about longer bypass and cross-clamp times, the need to undersize prostheses, and the possibility of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, the majority of cardiac surgeons currently prefer to preserve the posterior leaflet alone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| complete (preservation of both anterior and posterior leaflets) preservation of subvalvular apparatu | Active Comparator | complete (preservation of both anterior and posterior leaflets) preservation of subvalvular apparatus |
|
| partial (preservation of posterior leaflet only) preservation of subvalvular apparatus | Active Comparator | partial (preservation of posterior leaflet only) preservation of subvalvular apparatus |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mitral valve replacement | Procedure | complete versus partial preservation of subvavular apparatus during mitral valve replacement |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the outcomes of complete versus partial preservation of subvalvular apparatus in mitral valve replacement | To evaluate the outcomes of complete versus partial preservation of subvalvular apparatus in mitral valve replacement regarding:
| anticepated 3 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| amr mamdouh amr mamdouh, specialist | Contact | +201000566770 | amrmamdouh_95@yahoo.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assiut University Heart Hosiptal | Asyut | 711 | Egypt |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008944 | Mitral Valve Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided