Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Center for Translational Medicine | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This cross-sectional observational study aims to compare the clinical and radiographic periodontal status, as well as gingival crevicular fluid volume, among cigarette smokers, heated-tobacco product users, and non-smokers. Specifically, the aim is to determine whether tobacco product users exhibit worse clinical parameters-such as probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, clinical attachment loss-along with greater radiographic bone loss and higher gingival crevicular fluid volume than non-smokers.
Smoking is one of the main risk factors of periodontitis and its harmful effects on periodontal health are now well known. Thanks to worldwide restrictions, the use of traditional cigarettes is declining, but new alternative tobacco products such as heated tobacco products (e.g. IQOS, glo) have appeared on the market. These devices are often perceived less harmful by consumers, but there are conflicting results in the literature regarding their health effects.
Only one study has assessed periodontal health in heated tobacco product users, but in this study all participants were former smokers. No studies have evaluated periodontal health in heated tobacco users without a history of smoking traditional cigarettes on a regular basis.
Therefore, the aim of the present cross-sectional observational study is to compare the clinical and radiographic periodontal status and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume among cigarette-smokers, heated-tobacco product users and non-smokers.
The null hypothesis is that different tobacco product users have worse clinical and radiological periodontal parameters and higher GCF volume than non-smokers.
The study will be performed at the Department of Prosthodontics at Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Patients will be enrolled from the patient material of the Department of Prosthodontics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-smokers | Never consumed tobacco in any form | ||
| Cigarette smokers | Smoking at least 1 cigarette daily for at least 12 months | ||
| Heated tobacco product users | Using heated tobacco products e.g. IQOS exclusively at least once daily in the past 12 months and was not a regular traditional cigarette smoker |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Marginal bone loss in mm ( MBL) | Digital periapical radiographs will be taken of each tooth and be viewed on a calibrated computer screen using a software program. MBL is defined as the vertical distance from 2 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most crestal part of marginal alveolar bone. Measures of effect: mean and standard deviation | At baseline (first visit) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Full mouth plaque index (PI) | It is measured at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal,disto-lingual/palatal, mid-lingual/palatal and mesio-lingual/palatal) on all maxillary and mandibular teeth, except third molars. It is measured dichotomously. Score 1 if plaque biofilm is present and 0 if plaque biofilm is absent. A percentage score for the whole mouth is obtained by adding together the values for all teeth, dividing by the number of teeth and multiplying the result by 100. Measures of effect: mean and standard deviation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Healthy induviduals with no systemic diseases will be selected for this study.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orsolya Vámos, Dental | Contact | +3614591500/59313 | vamos.orsolya@semmelweis.hu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara Kispélyi, Dental | Semmelweis University, Department of Prosthodontics | Study Director |
| Kata Kelemen, Dental | Semmelweis University, Department of Prosthodontics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semmelweis University Department of Prosthodontics | Recruiting | Budapest | Pest County | 1088 | Hungary |
All data supporting our findings will be found in the prepared manuscript and the supplementary material.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005891 | Gingivitis |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D012907 | Smoking |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Gingival crevicular fluid samples will be collected from the deepest periodontal pocket on the buccal aspects of the mesial or distal interproximal sites of a maxillary single rooted tooth. A sterile paper strip (Periopaper, Amityville, NY, USA) is placed in the periodontal sulcus until resistance is felt and then held in place for 30 seconds. The strips of paper are then immediately placed in a calibrated electronic gingival fluid measuring device (Periotron 8000, Oraflow. Inc., New York) for volume determination (μL).
| At baseline (first visit) |
| Bleeding on Probing (BOP) | It is measured at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal,disto-lingual/palatal, mid-lingual/palatal and mesio-lingual/palatal) on all maxillary and mandibular teeth, except third molars. It is measured dichotomously. Score 1 if bleeding is present and 0 if bleeding is absent. A percentage score for the whole mouth is obtained by adding together the values for all teeth, dividing by the number of teeth and multiplying the result by 100. Measures of effect: mean and standard deviation | At baseline (first visit) |
| Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) | It is measured at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal,disto-lingual/palatal, mid-lingual/palatal and mesio-lingual/palatal) on all maxillary and mandibular teeth, except third molars. Using an UNC-15 periodontal probe, the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the periodontal pocket or sulcus is measured. This is recorded in millimeters (mm). Measures of effect: mean and standard deviation | At baseline (first visit) |
| Clinical attachment level (CAL) | It is measured at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal,disto-lingual/palatal, mid-lingual/palatal and mesio-lingual/palatal) on all maxillary and mandibular teeth, except third molars. To calculate the CAL, the position of the gingival margin relative to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the probing pocket depth is added together. CAL ismeasured in millimeter to the nearest mm using UNC-15 periodontal probe. Measures of effect: mean and standard deviation | At baseline (first visit) |
| Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) volume in μL | GCF samples are taken from the deepest periodontal pocket on the buccal aspects of the mesial or distal interproximal sites of a maxillary single rooted tooth. Prior to GCF collection, the selected site is isolated with sterile cotton swabs and the supragingival oral biofilm is carefully removed. The tooth is then dried with a gentle air. A sterile paper strip (Periopaper, Amityville, NY, USA) is placed in the periodontal sulcus until resistance is felt and then held in place for 30 seconds. Samples contaminated with blood or saliva are discarded and a new sample is taken from the same site after 15 minutes. The strips of paper are then immediately placed in a calibrated electronic gingival fluid measuring device (Periotron 8000, Oraflow. Inc., New York) for volume determination. Measures of effect: mean and standard deviation | At baseline (first visit) |
| Brigitta Teutsch, Medical doctor |
| Center for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University |
| Study Chair |
| D001519 |
| Behavior |