Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic training compared to conventional rehabilitation in patients with AC.
Nowadays, rehabilitation focuses on functional work during physiotherapy sessions to improve the patient's autonomy.
In the era of new technologies, robotics and virtual reality have shown great interest in functional rehabilitation and cortical reorganization.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Experimental | the intervention group will receive robotic training |
|
| control group | Active Comparator | control group will receive conventionnal rehabilitation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| robotic training | Other | continuous passive mobilization and robotic therapy on armeo sping |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| shoulder fonction using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) | It is a self-written questionnaire. It consists of twosubscales. The first assesses the importance of pain felt on five items. Pain scores range from 0 to 50. The second evaluates the difficulty of activities of daily living based on eight. Scores range from 0 to 80.questions | at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| pain using a visual analogue scale | It is a 100mm ruler that allows patients to rank their pain on a continuum from no pain to extreme pain. The patient places the indicator on a level that represents their current pain. | at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months |
| Active and passive range of motion |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sara skalli, doctor | Contact | +212661504251 | dr.skalli.sara@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| samia karkouri, professor | Mohammed V Souissi University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of medecine and pharmacy of rabat | Recruiting | Rabat | 10000 | Morocco |
excell table of data
start january 2025 end may 2025
doctors in the rehabilitation field can ask access by sending an email to the principal investigator
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002062 | Bursitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| conventionnal rehabilitation | Other | rehabilitation sessions with a physiotherapist |
|
Active and passive range of motion is clinically assessed using a goniometer while standing. We measured abduction, extension and external rotation. |
| at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months |