Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Mozo Grau Ticare | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized multicenter clinical study that compares two static guided surgery techniques in free-end partial edentulism.
The aim is to compare the accuracy obtained between dento-osseous supported and dento-mucosal supported surgical splints to place dental implants in posterior osseous ridges.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tooth supported guide | Active Comparator | Patients who will receive implant placement using a tooth supported surgical guide. |
|
| Bone and tooth supported guide | Experimental | Patients who will receive implant placement using a bone and tooth supported surgical guide. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental implant placement | Procedure | Placement of two dental implants in the jaw. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by intraoral scan and planning software) | Three-dimensional deviations between the planned implant position and the actual postoperative implant position will be assessed. The deviations will be measured using an intraoral scanner (Medit i700®) and planning software (BlueSky Plan®). Units of measure: horizontal and vertical linear deviation (in millimeters), global deviation (in millimeters), and angular deviation (in degrees), evaluated at both implant entry and apex points. | From enrollment to the end of surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by CBCT and planning software) | Three-dimensional deviations between the planned implant position and the actual postoperative implant position will be assessed. The deviations will be measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and planning software (BlueSky Plan®). Units of measure: horizontal and vertical linear deviation (in millimeters), global deviation (in millimeters), and angular deviation (in degrees), evaluated at both implant entry and apex points. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD | Contact | +34 965215755 | guillem@clinicaesteve.es |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clínica Dental Esteve | Recruiting | Alicante | Alicante | 03001 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32151043 | Result | Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Maida T, Cheng HC, Ou KL, Nezu T, Endo K. Stereolithographic Surgical Guide with a Combination of Tooth and Bone Support: Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in Distal Extension Situation. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 5;9(3):709. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030709. | |
| 38112164 | Result | Liu R, Xia R, Zhang L, Gan X, Li C, Liu Q, Chen Z, Chen Z. The influence of guide stabilizers and their application sequences on trueness and precision of surgical guides in free end situations: An in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Mar;35(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/clr.14226. Epub 2023 Dec 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001862 | Bone Resorption |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The operator does not know what type of surgical splint to use until the very moment of the operation, just after the anesthesia is applied.
| From enrollment to the end of surgery |
| Clínica Dental Sánchez Nicolás | Recruiting | Cabezo de Torres | Murcia | 30110 | Spain |
|
| 34218450 | Result | Kessler A, Le V, Folwaczny M. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Sep;32(9):1097-1104. doi: 10.1111/clr.13804. Epub 2021 Jul 17. |
| 37875645 | Result | Shi Y, Wang J, Ma C, Shen J, Dong X, Lin D. A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation. Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Oct 25;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w. |
| 29608793 | Result | Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Bouckaert E, Eghbali A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):721-732. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12897. Epub 2018 May 10. |
| 34006060 | Result | Cho JY, Kim SB, Ryu J. The accuracy of a partially guided system using an in-office 3D-printed surgical guide for implant placement. Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Feb 26;24(1):19-27. |
| 27062555 | Result | Raico Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):602-612. doi: 10.1111/clr.12841. Epub 2016 Apr 8. |
| 28632253 | Result | Bover-Ramos F, Vina-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Penarrocha-Diago M, Garcia-Mira B. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 January/February;33(1):101-115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556. Epub 2017 Jun 20. |