Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate if dynamic-guided surgery is an accurate system for placing dental implants.
Researchers will assess the dental implant accuracy of the dynamic guided system compared to the static pilot guide.
Participants will:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test group or Dynamic guided group | Experimental | in this arm, the position and angulation of the implant in the patient's mouth will be guided by a dynamic guided system. |
|
| Control group or Static guided group | Active Comparator | In this arm, the position and angulation of the implant in the patient's mouth will be guided by a stereolitographic pilot drill guide. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental implant placement | Device | Dental implant placement guided by Navident® (ClaroNav Inc., Toronto, Canada) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placement accuracy at the implant platform level | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm. | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. |
| Implant placement accuracy at the implant apex level | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm. | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. |
| Implant placement accuracy at an angular evel | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in degrees. | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. |
| Implant placement accuracy at the vertical plane. | Implant placement accuracy compared with the implant planning. Expressed in mm. | The data for the assessment is collected during the same appointment as the implant placement and requires an additional 20 minutes. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitat Internacional de Catalunya | Recruiting | Sant Cugat del Vallès | Barcelona | 08195 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24837492 | Background | Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug;26(8):882-890. doi: 10.1111/clr.12414. Epub 2014 May 19. | |
| 23062136 | Background | Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:112-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Plan to publish the IPD.
when the data is available during the publication process
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D035061 | Control Groups |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015340 | Epidemiologic Research Design |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D012107 | Research Design |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients who need dental implants and fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to test group (dynamic guided system) or control group (static stereolithographic pilot drill guided system)
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the nature of the treatment, it is impossible to mask the treatment from the participant and the care provider. However, the data for analysis will be masked to the investigator responsible for assessing the accuracy of each implant placement system.
| Static guided implant placement | Procedure | Dental implant placement guided by a stereolithographic pilot drill guide. |
|
|
| 23062137 | Background | Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:124-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x. |
| 27643585 | Background | Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, Ryan J. Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):92-99. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5004. Epub 2016 Sep 19. |
| 28000275 | Background | D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175. |
| 29310817 | Background | Sun TM, Lan TH, Pan CY, Lee HE. Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Jan;34(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Dec 8. |
| 26452429 | Background | Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30. |
| 4500182 | Background | O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available. |
| 28722969 | Background | Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. 2025 Feb 11. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441940/ |
| D008722 | Methods |