Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of this prospective study was to compare the effects of ESWT (extracorporeal shock wave therapy ) and prolotherapy on pain and foot function in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. In addition, the study was to investigate the changes in plantar pressure distribution and plantar fascia thickness measured by ultrasonography after ESWT and prolotherapy.
The fundamental questions that investigators want to answer are as follows:
[question 1]:Do ESWT and prolotherapy improve pain and foot function in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis? [question 2]:Do ESWT and prolotherapy change plantar pressure distribution and plantar fascia thickness in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis?
Chronic plantar fasciitis is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder that results in discomfort and impaired functionality within the plantar surface of the foot. In instances where conservative treatment proves ineffective, it can complicate the management of the condition. Two invasive treatment options, namely extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and prolotherapy, are available for the management of plantar fasciitis, with the objective of providing pain and functional improvement. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of ESWT and prolotherapy on pain, foot function, plantar fascia thickness and plantar pressure distribution in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.
A total of 70 patients who did not respond to conservative treatment were included in this prospective, randomised controlled study. Following a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation, the patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The study population was divided into two groups: the ESWT group (n = 36) and the prolotherapy group (n = 34). In the ESWT group, a total of 1800 to 2000 focused shock waves (0.15-0.25 mJ/mm² sessions with a frequency of 3-4 Hz) were applied. The prolotherapy group was administered a 3-ml injection of a 15% dextrose solution. The ESWT and prolotherapy treatments were administered in a total of three sessions, with two-week intervals between each session. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated using a number of different measures, including the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM), the thickness of the plantar fascia and the distribution of plantar pressure. The evaluations were conducted at the outset of the study, at the six-week mark, and at the 12-week mark following the final intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| extracorporeal shock wave therapy group | Experimental | In the ESWT group, a total of 1800 to 2000 focused shock waves (0.15-0.25 mJ/mm² sessions with a frequency of 3-4 Hz) were applied |
|
| Prolotherapy Group | Experimental | The prolotherapy group was administered a 3-ml injection of a 15% dextrose solution. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| extracorporeal shock wave therapy | Other | ESWT (Inceler Medical, Modus Focused ESWT, Turkey) was conducted by a single investigator in accordance with a standardised protocol. The patients were positioned prone on the examination table, with the affected limb placed in a supported position. The focused shockwave was applied in a circular motion along the insertion site of the plantar fascia and over the plantar fascia itself. The participants received 1,800 to 2,000 focused shock waves (0.15-0.25 mJ/mm² session with a frequency of 3-4 Hz). The frequency of the pulses was increased in a gradual manner, in accordance with the maximum tolerable degree of pain for each patient. A minimum dose of 1,000 mJ/mm² was administered. The ESWT was conducted in three sessions, with a two-week interval between each session. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) | The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was employed to evaluate the general perception of pain and the pain experienced at the first step upon rising. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a score of 0 indicating no pain and a score of 10 indicating the most severe pain imaginable | baseline - 6th week-12th week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) | The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) was developed to assess the physical function of individuals with foot pathology. FAAM is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 29 items, 21 of which pertain to activities of daily living (ADL) and 8 to sports. Each item of the FAAM is scored on a 5-point Likert scale with 4 points representing no difficulty at all; 3 points, slight difficulty; 2 points, moderate difficulty; 1 point, extreme difficulty; and 0 points, unable to do. The sixth option is not applicable if patients feel that this item does not concern them. If all items are answered, the ADL and sports subscales have a maximum score of 84 and 32, respectively. The obtained scores are transformed to percentages by dividing them with the maximum potential score and then multiplying the result by 100. A high score in both categories is indicative of a high level of physical functioning |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
In cases where symptoms were present on both sides, the more prominent side was included.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| AyÅŸe U Baykut | Ankara Åžehir Hastanesi Bilkent | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ankara Şehir Hastanesi Bilkent | Ankara | çankaya | 06530 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
all collected IPD
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D036981 | Fasciitis, Plantar |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005208 | Fasciitis |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D005534 | Foot Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074059 | Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy |
| D000075527 | Prolotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014464 | Ultrasonic Therapy |
| D003972 | Diathermy |
| D006979 | Hyperthermia, Induced |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Prolotherapy | Other | The solution employed for dextrose prolotherapy comprised 1.5 ml of 30% dextrose and 1.5 ml of 0.9% isotonic sodium chloride solution, resulting in a total of 3 ml of 15% dextrose solution. . All procedures were conducted by the same investigator. A dextrose solution was infused into the centre and around the damaged area using a peppering technique. Following the procedure, patients were advised to remain in a supine position with their feet restrained for a period of 15 minutes.. Prolotherapy was repeated on three occasions, with each session occurring at a two-week interval |
|
|
| baseline - 6th week-12th week |
| Thickness of the plantar fascia | A high-resolution ultrasound (5-13 MHz linear transducer, LOGIQ 9; GE Healthcare, China) was employed to ascertain the thickness of the plantar fascia. Ultrasonography measurements were conducted by the same individual, who has over five years of experience in this field. The participants were positioned in a prone manner with their ankles maintained in a neutral position. The thickness was measured in a vertical direction, commencing from the hyperechogenic border of the calcaneus bone and continuing until it reached the lower hyperechogenic edge of the plantar fascia. An average of three plantar fascia thickness measurements were taken at each assessment to minimise potential errors. The plantar fascia thickness was evaluated by a physiatrist who was unaware of the treatment groups | baseline - 6th week-12th week |
| Plantar pressure distribution | All participants underwent a static plantar pressure distribution assessment utilising the Formetric 4D system (DIERS MedicalSystems, Germany). In the test, each participant was required to stand on the platform, barefoot, with their feet side by side and facing forward for a period of five seconds. The parameters subjected to analysis were hindfoot plantar pressure (percent) and forefoot plantar pressure (percent) | baseline - 6th week-12th week |
| D026741 |
| Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |