Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation and pharmacologic treatment optimized according to guidelines in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation.
Multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial
Randomization 1:1 fashion A randomly permuted-block randomization list was generated by computer at a central location and was stratified by center.
Study duration:
Study subjects number: 50 patients (25 patients per group)
Procedures
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LBBAP+AVNA arm | Experimental | Left bundle branch area pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation. |
|
| Control arm | Sham Comparator | Pharmacologic treatment optimized according to guidelines in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacemaker implantation with Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) | Procedure | Left bundle branch pacing is a novel pacing modality that can bypass the pathological or disease-vulnerable region in the cardiac conduction system, to provide physiological pacing modality for patients. The procedure involves the implantation of a permanent pacemaker with a pacing lead positioned at the left bundle branch area to achieve physiological conduction system pacing. LBBAP-Pacemaker device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/ml) from baseline to 6-month follow-up | 6 months after intervention. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/ml) at 12, and 24 months | 12 months and 24 months after intervention. | |
| Change in health-related quality of life measured by 36-item short form survey (SF-36) questionnaire at 6, 12, 24 months | The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. |
Not provided
Inclusion:
Patients who meet all of the following inclusion criteria 1)-6).
Permanent atrial fibrillation
Age ≥ 65 years
Refractory or intolerant to antiarrhythmic drugs, rate control medications, or catheter ablation
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II- IV
LVEF > 40% (within the past 3 months)
Patients with at least one of the following:
Exclusion:
Patients who meet at least one of the following exclusion criteria 1)-11).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eue-keun Choi, M.D. Ph.D | Contact | 82-2-2072-0688 | choiek417@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seoul National University Hospital | Recruiting | Seoul | Jongno-gu | 03080 | South Korea |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) | Procedure | Atrioventricular node ablation uses heat energy, called radiofrequency energy, to destroy the area between the upper and lower heart chambers. This area is called the atrioventricular node. |
|
| Pharmacologic therapy optimized for Atrial Fibrillation management | Drug | Pharmacologic therapy includes rate control with beta-blockers (e.g., bisoprolol), calcium channel blockers (e.g., diltiazem), or antiarrhythmic drugs (e.g., flecainide, propafenone, dronedarone, amiodarone) along with anticoagulation therapy (e.g., apixaban) as per current clinical guidelines (e.g., ESC 2024 or ACC/AHA/HRS 2023) in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation. Treatment is tailored based on patient tolerance and clinical efficacy. |
|
| 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention. |
| Change in health-related quality of life measured by EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 6, 12, 24 months | The EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) evaluates health-related quality of life using a descriptive system with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores are derived as an index value (range: -0.594 to 1) The value attached to an EQ-5D profile according to a set of weights that reflect, on average, people's preferences about how good or bad the state is. Values are anchored at 1 (full health) and 0 (a state as bad as being dead) as required by their use in economic evaluation. Values less than 0 represent health states regarded as worse than a state that is as bad as being dead. An EQ-5D value is also sometimes known as an 'index', 'score' or 'utility' | 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention. |
| Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF, %) at 6, 12, and 24 months | 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention |
| Change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, mm) at 6, 12, and 24 months | 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention. |
| Change in left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD, mm) at 6, 12, and 24 months | 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention. |
| Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 6, 12, and 24 months | The NYHA functional classification system assesses the severity of heart failure symptoms on a scale from Class I (best) to Class IV (worst). Changes in functional class will be evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months after the intervention to determine the impact on patients' physical activity and symptom burden. | 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention. |
| Change in 6 min walk test at 6, 12, and 24 months | 6, 12, and 24 months after intervention |
| Change in cognitive function measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 6, 12, and 24 months | The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used cognitive screening tool that assesses various cognitive domains, including memory, attention, language, visuospatial skills, and executive function. The MoCA score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. A score of 26 or above is generally considered normal, while lower scores suggest cognitive impairment. Changes in MoCA scores will be evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months post-intervention. | 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention. |
| Procedure-related complications (tamponade, device infection, re-intervention, pneumothorax, vascular complications, others) | 24 months after intervention. |
| The all-cause mortality at 24 months | Death from any cause during the 24-month follow-up period. | 24 months after intervention. |
| Worsening Heart Failure (HF) at 24 Months | *Worsening HF with or without hospitalization: symptoms, signs, imaging, and analytical criteria that require unplanned medical attention with an increase of diuretic use, intravenous diuretic therapy | 24 months after intervention. |
| Composite Outcome: Mortality and worsening heart failure (HF) at 24 months | Participants meeting at least one of the criteria: (a) all-cause mortality, (b) worsening heart failure. | 24 months after intervention. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001281 | Atrial Fibrillation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided