Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In simulation-based training, the debriefing session is considered a cornerstone of learning. Therefore, this study aims to compare two different methods of debriefing sessions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Experimental group that used one of the debriefing methods |
|
| Group B | Experimental | Experimental group that used one of the debriefing methods |
|
| Group C | Other | A control group that used none of the debriefing methods |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debriefing Method 1 | Other | The researchers used a debriefing method that they chose after a virtual simulation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis 1 | There is a difference in the Simulation Effectiveness Tool scores between students using debriefing methods. | 1 week |
| Hypothesis 2 | There is a difference in the Debriefing Experience Scale scores between students using debriefing methods. | 1 week |
| Hypothesis 3 | There is a difference in The Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence scores between students using debriefing methods. | 1 week |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gulhane Faculty of Nursing | Ankara | Etlik | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Dreifuerst, K.T., 2015. Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clin Simul Nurs 11, 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005 | ||
| Background | Decker, S., Alinier, G., Crawford, S.B., Gordon, R.M., Jenkins, D., Wilson, C., 2021. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM The Debriefing Process. Clin Simul Nurs 58, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011 | ||
| 29449994 | Result | Cheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, Chang TP, Nadkarni VM, Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould J, Lin Y, Cook DA, Pusic M, Hui J, Moher D, Egger M, Auerbach M; International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education (INSPIRE) Reporting Guidelines Investigators. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Jul 25;1:25. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0025-y. eCollection 2016. |
Not provided
Not provided
Researchers believe that it is important to share the data of the study with other researchers following the completion of the data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Parallel group-randomized trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Debriefing Method VP | Other | The researchers used the debriefing method that virtual patient simulator presents |
|
| Debriefing Method 2 | Other | The researchers used a debriefing method that they chose after a virtual simulation |
|