Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this clinical trial is to contribute valuable insights into the role of Dexmedetomidine as a synergistic agent in prolonging subarachnoid block duration, with the overarching goal of enhancing perioperative care and surgical success rates.
Dexmedetomidine is a frequently used alpha-2 adrenergic agonist for anesthesia and sedation due to its excellent selectivity. Dexmedetomidine can cause drowsiness, analgesia, and sympathetic reactions when injected intravenously. Dexmedetomidine has been investigated for possible synergistic benefits when used in conjunction with hyperbaric bupivacaine for subarachnoid block, sometimes referred to as spinal anesthesia. Because hyperbaric bupivacaine can produce a rapid onset and a longer duration of sensory and motor blockage, it is a common local anesthetic used in spinal anesthesia.
Numerous research studies have examined the synergistic effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in subarachnoid blocks. These effects are primarily observed in terms of extending the duration of sensory and motor blockade, enhancing postoperative analgesia, decreasing intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, and improving patient satisfaction. The mechanism underlying this synergistic effect is believed to be connected to the effects of dexmedetomidine on the central nervous system, which include its capacity to modify pain pathways, improve spinal anesthesia, and produce drowsiness and anxiolysis.
Although the combination of dexmedetomidine with hyperbaric bupivacaine has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in a number of studies, there is still discussion and continuing research over the best time, dosage, and patient selection criteria. As with any anesthesia procedure, the best course of action should be determined after taking into account specific patient considerations such age, comorbidities, and concurrent drugs.
Hameed et al compare the Synergistic effect of Dexmedetomidine on Subarachnoid Block with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine among three groups. In there study Patients in Group 1 received 2 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine; Group 2 received a combination of bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine infusion; and Group 3 received bupivacaine followed by Dexmedetomidine infusion. Their study show that onset time of sensory blockade. The duration of sensory blockade and the rate of recovery of complete sensory block was significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1. The distribution of adverse effect among group 1 and group 2 was, hypotension 20% vs 40%, Bradycadria 8% vs 24%, and Nausea 12% vs 12% respectively.
Previous studies have indicated that Dexmedetomidine can enhance the duration and quality of sensory blockade, improve postoperative analgesia, and reduce opioid consumption when used in conjunction with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Despite these promising findings, further exploration is warranted to elucidate the optimal dosage, timing, and patient selection criteria for Dexmedetomidine administration in subarachnoid blocks. Understanding the mechanistic basis of Dexmedetomidine's synergistic effects on subarachnoid block duration is crucial for refining anesthesia protocols and ultimately improving patient outcomes. By conducting this research study, the investigators aim to contribute valuable insights into the role of Dexmedetomidine as a synergistic agent in prolonging subarachnoid block duration, with the overarching goal of enhancing perioperative care and surgical success rates.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A Hyperbaric Bupivicaine | Experimental | Group A (Unexposed) will received 2 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine. |
|
| GROUP B Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine | Experimental | Group B (Exposed) will receive a combination of bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine infusion. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperbaric bupivacaine | Drug | Group A (Unexposed) will received 2 ml of intrathecal bupivacaine |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine when used adjunctively with hyperbaric bupivacaine in extending the duration of sensory and motor blockade in subarachnoid anesthesia. | Sensory Blockade Duration: This refers to the time interval from the administration of the subarachnoid block until the complete recovery of sensory function in the dermatomes affected by the anesthesia. It will be assessed using standardized sensory tests, such as pinprick or cold sensation, within the affected dermatomes. Motor Blockade Duration:It encompasses the time from the onset of motor blockade to the complete recovery of motor function and will assessed by evaluating muscle strength and movement capability using modified Bromage score as 0=Subject is able to lift the leg straight and move the hip, knee and ankle.
| periodically motor blockade will be assessed until the achievement of modified Bromage score 3 from giving anesthesia till shifting of the patient to parent ward |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Investigate the safety profile of Dexmedetomidine in combination with hyperbaric bupivacaine, in term of adverse events such as hypotension, bradycardia, and patient satisfaction. | Sedation levels will be assessed using the Ramsay score
Bradycardia:defined as a heart rate of less than 50 beats per minute. Patient Satisfaction:defined in terms of subjective assessment of the patient's physical and emotional well-being during the procedure include observed signs of distress, facial expressions, and verbal feedback. Patients' satisfaction will be assessed using a 10cm Visual Analogue Score. Where 10cm denoted maximal satisfaction and 0cm denoted minimal. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FARYAL UZMA, MBBS | Contact | +923315138986 | faryaluzma1606@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lady Reading Hospital Mti Peshawar Kp Pakistan | Peshawar | KPK | 25000 | Pakistan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33487907 | Background | Sharma A, Varghese N, Venkateswaran R. Effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus intravenous dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul-Sep;36(3):381-385. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_323_17. Epub 2020 Sep 14. |
Not provided
Not provided
the patients identity will be kept anonymous
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020927 | Dexmedetomidine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007093 | Imidazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| hyperbaric bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine | Drug | Group B (Exposed) will receive a combination of bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine infusion |
|
| till the shifting of patient to parent ward. |