• Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone With and Without Using Autogenous Mixed With Xenograft

  NCT04096209

  Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Sep 19, 2019
• Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Professionalization in Aesthetic Area

  NCT03665025

  Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Sep 12, 2018
• Immediate Implant Using Socket Shield Technique With Xenogenic Bone Graft

  NCT04489654

  Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Jul 28, 2020
• Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Versus Allogeneic Bone Graft Around Dental Implant in Aesthetic Zone

  NCT06773104

  CompletedInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Jan 20, 2026
• Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars

  NCT06962878

  Not yet recruitingInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Aug 6, 2025
• Immediate Implants in Maxillary Premolar Region Using Xenograft vs Allograft

  NCT03716323

  Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableUpdated Oct 23, 2018

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT06653868

Lead Sponsor

Cairo UniversityOTHER

Overall Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

Not Applicable

Enrollment

20Estimated

Last Update Posted

Oct 22, 2024Actual

Start Date

Oct 20, 2024Estimated

Primary Completion Date

Mar 20, 2026Estimated

Completion Date

Mar 20, 2026Estimated

Official Title

Grafting of the Peri-implant Bony Defects Around Immediate Implants Using Xenogenic Versus Alloplastic Sticky Grafts: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Brief Summary

In patients with a single non restorable tooth, does filling the peri-implant buccal gap with alloplastic sticky grafts result comparable results compared to xenogenic sticky grafts?

Detailed Description

The buccal aspect of the dental implant has great importance, especially in the aesthetic zone, because the buccal bone is very thin especially in the anterior maxilla and its resorption can result in recession of the soft tissue. A gap occurs in immediately placed implant due to discrepancy between the dimensions of the extraction socket and the implant. Augmentation of the buccal gap decreases the amount of buccal bone resorption and soft tissue recession . Filling the peri-implant defects has been widely discussed to prevent further bone loss. The use of biologic materials such as platelet rich fibrin can enhance the quality of alloplastic bone grafts to give comparable effect when compared to xenogenic grafts.

• Bone Loss, Alveolar

• dental implant with bone augmentation

Ages Eligible for Study

Adult (18-64)

Sexes Eligible for Study

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with healthy systemic condition (Mazzotti et al., 2023).

2. Age from 20-50 years old

3. Patients must be free of any systemic disease which could influence the surgical procedure.

4. Tooth involved in the esthetic zone.

5. Sufficient hard and soft tissue volume in vertical and buccolingual direction

6. Natural teeth adjacent to the involved tooth will be required to be free from infection.

7. Controlled oral hygiene.

8. Indication for tooth extraction included (Degidi et al., 2012);

   • Endodontic failures
   • Untreatable caries
   • Non- restorable teeth
   • Vertical root fracture
   • Remaining roots

Exclusion Criteria:

- 1.Pregnant females 2.Smokers (Khuller, 2009) 3.Unmotivated and uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene 4.Patients with habits that may compromise the longevity and affect the result of the study as alcoholism or parafunctional habits.

5.Presence of acute dento-alveolar infection.

Primary Purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional Model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple

Lead Sponsor

Cairo UniversityOTHER

bassant_mohye@hotmail.com01006744545