Comparative Study Between the Performance of Opioid Free Anesthesia Versus Conventional Opioid Based Anesthesia Regarding Achievement of Enhanced Recovery in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries
Comparative Study Between the Performance of Opioid Free Anesthesia Versus Conventional Opioid Based Anesthesia Regarding Achievement of Enhanced Recovery in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries
This Study aims to evaluate the efficacy of opioid free general anesthesia in achieving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic bariatric surgery in terms of post-operative recovery time, cumulative pethidine consumption and number of episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV).
While opioids have been commonly used in the operating room due to their effectiveness in pain management and anesthesia, there are numerous common side effects that have an impact on patient recovery. Obese patients or those with pre-existing respiratory difficulties such as sleep apnea or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are more likely to experience respiratory failure after getting opiate therapy. Other effects of opioid use include gastro-intestinal obstacles such nausea, vomiting, and constipation.
The concept of opioid-free anesthesia evolved due to the potential adverse side effects associated with intraoperative opioid usage.
This study examines nociceptive monitoring's potential role in opioid-free anesthesia, as well as research on the topic. This study aims to compare the effects of an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) regimen versus an opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) regimen on postoperative pain and enhanced recovery in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
emanzain@med.asu.edu.eg01017254024
01017254024