Opioid-free Anesthesia vs Opioid-based Anesthesia / A Heavyweight Showdown - Randomized Controlled Trial
Opioid-free Anesthesia vs Opioid-based Anesthesia / A Heavyweight Showdown - Randomized Controlled Trial
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) versus traditional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The study evaluates postoperative pain, need for rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative nociception monitoring (NOL index), and patient satisfaction. A total of 60 patients were randomized into two parallel groups receiving either OFA or OBA according to standardized anesthetic protocols.
Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe and morbid obesity, but perioperative pain management and PONV remain significant challenges. Traditional opioid-based anesthesia is associated with adverse effects such as respiratory depression, postoperative hyperalgesia, ileus, and delayed recovery.
Opioid-free anesthesia is an emerging strategy based on the use of multimodal, non-opioid agents-including dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, and ketamine-aimed at providing adequate analgesia while reducing opioid-related complications.
This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether OFA improves postoperative pain control, reduces the requirement for rescue analgesia, and promotes better perioperative outcomes compared to OBA in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Outcomes include NRS pain scores at multiple time points, NOL monitoring during surgery, PONV occurrence, and patient satisfaction at discharge.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: