Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Lynch Regenerative Medicine | NETWORK |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Skin cancers such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma lesions that develop on the head and neck are treated by Mohs surgery or wide local excision to remove all tumor cells and preserve the normal tissue. These surgical techniques may result in large defects requiring reconstruction to restore function and aesthetics. Rotational flaps and free flaps are techniques used to reconstruct large, complex defects that cannot be closed with sutures, staples, or glue. Older, frail patients are particularly vulnerable to complications from these procedures often leaving them to care for chronic wounds until a skin graft can be placed. Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) revealed a cohort of patients with a single nucleotide variant (SNV) in PDGFRβ having a higher incidence of chronic skin ulcers, skin grafts, and other skin and connective tissue disorders suggesting that the loss of PDGFβ signaling may impair healing following trauma. rhPDGF-BB, a recombinant human platelet derived growth factor protein-based therapy, signals through PDGFRβ to mediate inflammation, granulation, angiogenesis, and remodeling during wound healing and skin repair and is FDA cleared for diabetic neuropathic ulcers and periodontal bone and soft tissue reconstructions. These data suggest rhPDGF-BB may be a viable therapeutic strategy to augment the reconstruction of these complex defects by accelerating granulation, epithelialization, and wound closure.
This Phase II clinical trial will evaluate the potential efficacy of rhPDGF-BB-enhanced wound matrix versus wound matrix saturated with normal saline to augment healing of head and neck defects that cannot be healed by primary intention following skin cancer excision. This prospective, double-blinded, single-site study will randomize participants into two arms - intervention and control - comparing the granulation, re-epithelialization, complete healing, and scarring of the wound bed, pain, and quality of life. After recruiting, consenting, and screening, participants will undergo the baseline procedure to place the wound matrix into the wound bed. Randomization will occur immediately before the baseline procedure, and both the PI and participant will be blinded. To achieve balance in treatment allocation, randomization blocks of 4 (2 interventions : 2 controls) will be stratified by anatomical location, scalp versus face/neck, and greatest dimension, < 3cm versus > 3cm, of the surgical defect. Following the baseline procedure, participants will return for their first follow-up visit on day 6 for a clinical examination, suture removal, and wound dressing change, and then again at weeks 4 and 8 for a clinical exam and photographs. Pain and adverse events will be evaluated and documented weekly through the participants' electronic health records, phone call, email survey, or in-person. Participants will submit daily photographs of the wound while performing dressing changes at home starting on day 7 until day 56. These photographs will be taken using a wound imaging application that will be downloaded to a personal mobile device with assistance from the study coordinator. Each patient will also receive a hard copy of instructions for using the application at home. The mobile application can ensure quality photographs and transfer the images to a password-protected cloud-based portal. The photographs will be analyzed by blinded wound experts, retrospectively, to determine the precise day that the wound bed achieved 81-100% granulation. The imaging software will also be used to trace and measure the rate of healing by granulation, re-epithelialization, and wound closure. Under routine care with a wound matrix (no rhPDGF-BB), the average time to granulation is 4-6 weeks in this patient population. Here, we aim to reduce the time to readiness by adding rhPDGF-BB. It is expected that all participants will complete the study which begins at time of signing informed consent and ends at the final study follow-up visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saline matrix | Placebo Comparator | Participants receive wound matrix saturated with normal saline. |
|
| rhPDGF-BB matrix | Experimental | Participants receive wound matrix saturated with rhPDGF-BB. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RhPDGF-BB | Drug | 0.3 mg/mL rhPDGF-BB |
| |
| Saline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time-to-Readiness for Skin Graft in Days | Time to 81-100% granulation of wounds as assessed by expert clinical review of photographs taken daily starting at day 7 | Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Granulation Rate | Percent granulation versus time in days as determined by clinical assessment of the percent granulation of the wound bed in photographic images taken daily starting at day 7 following the baseline procedure. | Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure |
| Change in Granulation on a 5-Point Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob J Smith | Contact | 615-875-7466 | jacob.smith@vumc.org | |
| Cyndi R Clark, PhD | Contact | cyndi.r.clark@vumc.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wesley P Thayer | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Recruiting | Nashville | Tennessee | 37203 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42145621 | Derived | Clark CR, Blette BS, Guzman RAT, Lempicki MD, Karamitros G, Gergoudis F, Gutama BW, O'Neill DR, Savitz B, Smith J, Shirey-Rice JK, Pulley JM, Lynch SE, McGonigle TW, Thayer WP. Study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial evaluating recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor B (rhPDGF) in the reconstruction of complex head or neck defects following skin cancer excision. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2026 May 4:2026.05.01.26352276. doi: 10.64898/2026.05.01.26352276. | |
| 40952157 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072836 | Surgical Wound |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077214 | Becaplermin |
| D012965 | Sodium Chloride |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020574 | Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sis |
| D010982 | Platelet-Derived Growth Factor |
| D036341 | Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins |
| D010455 | Peptides |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
Normal saline |
|
Weekly ordinal scale outcomes of granulation as determined by clinical review of wound bed granulation in photographs taken daily starting at day 7 following the baseline procedure. Ordinal scale ranges from 1 to 5 in the increments below.
|
| Weekly, starting at week 1 up to week 8 following the baseline procedure |
| Time to re-epithelialization | Time to 100% re-epithelialization as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure the percent of new epithelial tissue formed on the wound in daily photographs | Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure |
| Re-epithelialization rate | Percent re-epithelialization versus time as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure the percent of new epithelial tissue formed on the wound in daily photographs | Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure |
| Time to complete healing | Time to complete healing as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure wound closure in daily photographs | Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure |
| Healing rate | Wound size change over time to as assessed by expert clinicians utilizing the NetHealth Tissue Analytics software to measure wound closure in daily photographs | Daily, starting at day 7 up to day 56 following the baseline procedure |
| Aesthetics Rating at Week 8 | Aesthetics rating of the wound as assessed by clinical examination at the final week 8 follow-up visit using an ordinal scale from 0 (very ugly) to 10 (very nice). | Week 8 |
| Scar Scale at Week 8 | Scar rating of the wound as assessed by clinical examination at the final week 8 follow-up visit, with rating determined by the Manchester Scar Scale. | Week 8 |
| Change from Baseline in Pain on an 11-Point Scale | Weekly self-reported participant surveys will assess average pain intensity on an 11-point scale. Possible scores range from 0 (No Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain). | From enrollment through week 8 |
| Change from Baseline in Quality of Life | Change in quality of life based on a self-reported 12-question survey taken at baseline and at week 8. | From enrollment through week 8 |
| Number of Participants Recruited and Eligible | Total number of participants that were recruited and eligible for the study. | Monthly up to month 15 |
| Number of Participants Randomized Per Month | Number of participants that were randomized each month of the study. | Monthly up to month 15 |
| Proportion of Participants Retained at Week 8 | Proportion of participants retained in the study at week 8 (end of study). | Week 8 |
| Weekly Percentage of Completed Daily Photos at Week 8 | Participant adherence to daily wound photograph schedule. | Weekly, week 1 up to week 8 |
| Derived |
| Younan SA, Ueland TE, Savitz BL, Jerome RN, Budine TD, Hawkins AT, Thayer WP, Wu DT, Lynch SE, Clark CR. Recombinant Platelet-Derived Growth Factor in Tissue Repair: A Review Exploring Frontiers in Regenerative Medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2026 Apr 1;157(4):759-770. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012426. Epub 2025 Sep 15. |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D004268 | DNA-Binding Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
| D002712 | Chlorides |
| D006851 | Hydrochloric Acid |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017670 | Sodium Compounds |