Effectiveness of the Kinesiotaping in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: a Randomized, Sham-controlled, Single-blind Study
Effectiveness of the Kinesiotaping in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: a Randomized, Sham-controlled, Single-blind Study
Lateral epicondylitis significantly impacts daily activities and productivity at work, making it a condition of substantial clinical and socioeconomic importance.Despite its high prevalence, clinical significance, and impact on daily life, the optimal management of LE remains a topic of ongoing debate.
This study aims to investigate the efficacy of kinesiotaping (KT) on pain intensity, functional status, and quality of life in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE).
The study was conducted in the outpatient clinic for level 3 physical medicine and rehabilitation. Patients were randomized into two groups: the real kinesiotaping + home exercise group and the sham taping + home exercise group (randomized by a medical secretary outside the study). A set of widely accepted, literature-consistent primer and seconder outcomes were statistically compared to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other.
Between February 1, 2024, and August 31, 2024, a total of 42 patients (17 females, 25 males) with chronic LE were included. Patients were randomized into either the KT or sham-controlled group. Patients were blinded to which group they were assigned to. The taping was performed by the same physician, who was trained and experienced in kinesiotaping.
Kinesiotaping and sham-taping were applied six times over three weeks. Both groups received recommendations for activity modification and a home-based stretching and strengthening exercise program. The exercise program was designed by an author who has a national book chapter on exercise for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, taking into account patient specificity and adherence, and in accordance with the literaturExercise adherence was monitored through weekly outpatient controls (while taping) and by phone check-ins two weeks after the taping was completed.
Outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Patient-Rated Forearm Evaluation Questionnaire (PRFEQ), grip strength, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), quality of life in Short Form-36 (SF-36), and The Roles and Maudsley patient satisfaction score. The subjects were assessed before treatment, at the end of treatment (week three), and four weeks after the end of treatment (week seven).The assessment parameters were also conducted by the same researcher to ensure consistency.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: