Effects of a Targeted Nutritional Supplement on Muscle Volume and Function After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Effects of a Targeted Nutritional Supplement on Muscle Volume and Function After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to prospectively evaluate the effects of essential amino acid (EAA) supplementation on the volume and structure of the muscles surrounding the spine (paraspinal musculature). The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will be asked to:
Researchers will compare the group that consumed EAA supplement and the group that consumed placebo to see if there is a difference in paraspinal muscle volume changes and measures of spinal alignment, functional abilities, pain levels, and opioid use.
This study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, single-center clinical trial to elucidate the effects of perioperative essential amino acid nutritional supplementation in pursuit of the following aim and covariates:
Specific Aim 1: Preserve paraspinal muscle volume and assess impact on spine sagittal balance through measurement of radiographic parameters. Paraspinal muscle atrophy following lumbar spine surgery has been correlated with worse clinical outcomes. It is still not understood whether iatrogenic denervation, immobilization, or nutritional deficiencies lead to the reduced volume in the paraspinal muscles. Investigators will utilize pre- and post-operative MRI scans to quantify changes in paraspinal and psoas muscle cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration, and measure sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt, as muscle quality has been correlated with spine balance and degeneration, as well as bone quality.
Specific Aim 2: Assess clinical outcomes postoperatively to determine any possible effect of paraspinal muscle volumes on variability in functional status. Functional assessments will be made using established, validated clinical outcomes measures at baseline and up to 2 years postoperatively. Postoperative adverse events will be recorded throughout the duration of the study, as well as markers of nutritional status using a validated dietary questionnaire and blood sampling. Results will be compared between treatment and control groups to determine if functional status is associated with variability in outcomes related to preservation of native paraspinal muscle volume postoperatively.
Specific Aim 3: Evaluate postoperative pain and opioid consumption postoperatively to determine any possible effect of pain on variability in paraspinal muscle volumes. Patient-reported pain and opioid consumption will be evaluated perioperatively with a daily pain diary, clinician-administered pain assessments, and review of the state-controlled substances database (CURES). Pain ratings, mean morphine equivalents, time to baseline preoperative opioid consumption, and time to opioid discontinuation will be compared between treatment and control groups to determine any relationship between postoperative pain levels on variability in outcomes related to preservation of native paraspinal muscle volume following surgery.
Description of Procedures:
Study team members will review the patient medical record for the minimal amount of health information necessary to determine eligibility in the study prior to obtaining informed consent. Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery that meet eligibility requirements-determined using standard nutritional and lumbar surgical clinical research inclusion/exclusion criteria applied according to the judgment of the investigator-will receive standardized written and verbal information about the trial from the investigators listed in the study team. For non-English speaking participants, an interpreter will be involved in the consenting process.
A member of the research team will be unblinded and responsible for block randomization of participants with 1:1 allocation to EAA and placebo groups (N=44 each group) using Excel 2016 (Microsoft). The University of California Irvine (UCI) Investigational Drug Services Pharmacy (IDS Pharmacy) is responsible for receiving, labeling, storing, and distributing the products and will collect product containers/any unused products at the conclusion of the supplement period as outlined in the study protocol. The remainder of the study team (including the primary investigator and co-researchers) and the statistician responsible for data analysis will be blinded to randomization.
Demographic and baseline information regarding nutritional, functional, and frailty status will be collected at the baseline visit within 6 weeks to 1 week prior to surgery, including ambulatory status (independent, cane, walker, wheelchair); food preferences (omnivorous, pescatarian, vegan, vegetarian); Protein Screener 55+ (a validated questionnaire to screen for low dietary protein intake in the elderly); modified Fragility Index (a validated risk stratification tool in lumbar spine surgery); and baseline labs (including serum albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin as markers of nutritional status and inflammation), functionality, pain scores, and medication use. From 1 week prior to surgery until 2 weeks postoperatively, patients will consume either a commercially available EAA supplement-containing L-leucine (3.6g), L-lysine as L-lysine HCl (3.2g), L-phenylalanine (3.2g), L-valine (2.4g), L-threonine (2.8g), L-isoleucine (2.0g), L-methionine (0.6g), and L-histidine as L-histidine HCl (2.2g) (Joint Replacement; Mend Labs, New York, NY) twice daily-or calorically-equivalent placebo (alanine, 20g twice daily).
Fellowship-trained spine surgeons will perform all lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgeries using the same posterior operative approach and instrumented fusion of unstable segments if clinically indicated. All patients are hospitalized from the day of surgery until discharge, with the total length of stay dependent on postoperative pain control and progress in physical therapy. Patient-reported pain will be evaluated with a daily pain diary using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale beginning 1 week prior to surgery for at least 2 weeks postoperatively or until termination of opioid consumption (for a maximum of 1 month). Patients will be educated to also record pain levels each time they take an opioid. Opioid consumption-including oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, codeine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, and tramadol-will be captured simultaneously through a pain medication diary and compared between treatment groups as mean morphine equivalents. Time to less than baseline opioid consumption and time to opioid discontinuation will also be compared between treatment groups. Clinician-administered patient pain ratings using the Visual Analogue Score will be recorded at baseline, on the day of surgery, and at each postoperative visit.
Timeline of Study Procedures:
Statistical Plan:
Power analysis: Sample size analysis was performed a priori using data from the literature evaluating muscle atrophy with and without nutritional supplementation in patients with total knee arthroplasty, as there is no data assessing paraspinal muscle volume after lumbar spine surgery, with an expected difference in primary outcome measure of 4.9% (13.4% +/- 1.9% in control and 8.5% in experimental). Using two independent groups, a continuous variable primary endpoint, an assumed 2-tailed type-1 error rate of 0.05, and a power value of 80% we require a minimum total of 88 patients with 44 in each group.
Overall: Baseline characteristics will be compared between the groups using independent t tests (or the Wilcoxon rank sum test, if the characteristics were not normally distributed) for continuous measures and the chi-square test for categorical measures. Continuous variables will be described using the mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be described using absolute frequencies. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) will be used to assess relationships between paraspinal muscle CSA, opioid consumption as morphine milligram equivalents (MME), clinical functional outcome measures, and postoperative complications. A two-way repeated measured analysis of variance (ANOVA) will evaluate chronological changes in continuous variables between the two groups. Significance will be set at p < 0.05.
Specific Aim 1: Axial T2-weighted lumbar spine MRI at the levels of the L1-5 intervertebral discs using a 3 Tesla (3T) MRI with a phased-array surface coil will be completed within 6 months to 6 weeks (about 1 and a half months) prior to surgery and prior to treatment intervention and will be compared to the repeat MRI completed at 8-10 weeks postoperatively. Bilateral paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) will be measured by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists marking the borders of these muscles. Proton density fat fraction will be used to quantify the proportion of fatty infiltration and overall atrophy will be qualitatively rated based on visual assessment using a visual scale modified from the Goutallier grading system. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment parameters including sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt will be measured on both the pre and postoperative MRIs. The intraclass correlation coefficient for this measurement will be evaluated and interpreted according to the predetermined guidelines.
Specific Aim 2: Functional status will be assessed for each treatment arm at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively using established, validated clinical outcome measures completed with a trained member of research staff: the Oswestry Disability Index 2.1A, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, EuroQol-5 Dimension 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), 6-minute walk test, and 5 repetitive sit to stand test. Preoperative mortality and morbidity risk will be controlled between treatment groups using the modified Frailty Index. Postoperative adverse events will be recorded throughout the duration of the study, including but not limited to hospital length of stay, surgical site infections, unplanned reoperation, mortality, and medical complications requiring intervention.
Specific Aim 3: Patient-reported pain will be evaluated with a daily pain diary using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale beginning 1 week prior to surgery for at least 2 weeks postoperatively or until termination of opioid consumption (for a maximum of 1 month). Patients will be educated to also record pain levels each time they. Opioid consumption-including oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, codeine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, and tramadol-will be captured simultaneously through a pain medication diary and compared between treatment groups as MME.
Safety Monitoring:
A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) consisting of 7 UCI faculty members from various relevant disciplines-including orthopaedic surgery, anesthesiology, nutrition, pharmacology, biostatistics-has been assembled to ensure the safety of all study participants throughout the duration of the study period. At the first safety meeting prior to subject enrollment, the DSMB will discuss the protocol and agree upon guidelines to study monitoring. Subsequently, study data will be evaluated continuously by the study team and meetings of the DSMB will be held at least two times a year (every 6 months). As part of the purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of amino acid supplementation on functional/clinical outcomes, pain, and opioid use, data ensuring compliance in supplement ingestion, pain levels, medication use, functional outcomes, and adverse events will be continuously documented. No adverse outcomes are expected given that the amino acid supplement is commercially available and has shown to be safe for human consumption. However, unscheduled emergency meetings may be called at any time by the DSMB or the study investigators should participant safety questions or other unanticipated problems or adverse events arise-such as renal failure, severe GI distress, or melena. Safety updates and reports will be submitted to the UCI Institutional Review Board with the continuing application each year.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: