Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The current study aimed to evaluate both the quality and quantity of gained and maintained bone width after ridge splitting utilizing autogenic bone wedges versus mixed bone particles for horizontal ridge augmentation in the anterior esthetic zone.
This randomized clinical study included 20 patients with a horizontally deficient ridge in the esthetic region. Two groups were divided according to the type of intercortical bone graft used after ridge splitting: 10 patients for each. (The intervention group) had grafting with autogenous bone wedges harvested from the chin, and (the control group) had mixed (autogenic and xenogenic) bone particles.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| intervention group | Other | the group using an autogenous bone wedge harvested from the chin interpositioned between split cortices in the anterior maxilla to manage the horizontal deficiency of the ridge. |
|
| control group | Other | the group used mixed autogenic and xenogenic bone particles that interposed between split cortices in anterior maxilla to manage the horizontal deficiency of the ridge |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| autogenous bone wedge | Procedure | autogenous bone block harvested from chin and adjusted to be wedged intercortical in split ridge |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bone width in (mm) by cone beam pre, immediate post operative and 6 months postoperative | after ridge augmentation in both groups, the bone width will be measured immediately postoperatively and 6 months postoperatively with cone beam and the measurements of the three intervals (pre-, immediate and 6 months postoperatively) will be compared in both groups to evaluate the amount of gained and maintained bone width | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| percentage of areas of new bone (%) | The harvested core biopsies would be stained with H&E and Massons trichrome stain and be microscopically examined to determine percentage areas of newly formed bone | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients possessed partially edentulous anterior maxillary ridge with the following criteria
All patients were free from any medical conditions that may affect bone healing .
No local pathosis that may interfere with bone healing.
No previous grafting procedures at the indicated edentulous ridge.
-
Exclusion Criteria:
1- Patients suffering from any systemic disease that may affect bone healing. 2- Patients with less than 3mm labio palatal alveolar ridge width. 3- Ridge with inadequate vertical bone height. 4- Presence of any local pathosis that may interfere with bone healing. 5- Patients unable to continue the whole follow up.
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| yasmin ahmed, B.D.S | Contact | 01065273456 | yasmin.ahmed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg | |
| Mohamed Omara, PHD | Contact | 01144452862 |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oral and maxillo facial Surgery Department; Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University. | Recruiting | Cairo | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31260166 | Background | Atef M, Osman AH, Hakam M. Autogenous interpositional block graft vs onlay graft for horizontal ridge augmentation in the mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):678-685. doi: 10.1111/cid.12809. Epub 2019 Jul 1. | |
| 40544250 | Derived | Omara M, Mekhemer S, Mansour S, Ahmed Y. Ridge splitting using autogenous bone wedge versus the conventional intercortical augmentation technique in horizontally deficient anterior maxilla: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 21;25(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06345-z. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided