Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Fourteen patients having anterior maxillary undercut defect were selected to match a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The participants were randomly allocated using a computer system into two groups:
Group A undergo inverted U-shaped maxillary ridge splitting using piezotomes with simultaneous implant placement in the same surgery.
Group B undergo inverted U-shaped maxillary ridge splitting as a first stage and after four weeks, ridge expansion and implant placement will be performed with only envelop flap.
Assessment included measurements of bone gain at the undercut defect and bone density labial to implants in each group from the cone-beam computed tomography
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| One stage ridge splitting | Active Comparator |
| |
| Two-stage ridge splitting | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One stage ridge splitting with simultaneous implant placement | Procedure | A full mucoperiosteal flap was raised using the sharp periosteal elevator to expose the bone crestally and buccally. An inverted U-shaped bone cut, down to the cancellous bone, was done in the undercut area with a piezoelectric device. The horizontal bone cut was made apical to the most concave point in the undercut area with a distance of 3 mm. The two vertical bone cuts were placed at least 1 mm away from the adjacent roots and extended beyond the undercut area. The released bone end was minimally elevated using a periosteotome through a greenstick fracture. All implants were installed with the implant shoulders flush to the bone level using a low-speed drilling procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in bone density buccal to the implant | Bone density was evaluated by CBCT | baseline and 4 months |
| Change in bone width gain at the undercut area | Bone width gain was evaluated by CBCT | baseline and 4 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | Alexandria | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Two-stage ridge splitting with implant placement | Procedure | The first surgery is the same as one stage ridge splitting Four weeks later, after revascularization between the bone block and the mucoperiosteum, the second surgery will be performed. A crestal incision was done and the envelope flap slightly elevated to preserve the blood supply. The implants will be placed in the same manner as one stage ridge splitting |
|