Comparison of Percutaneous and Conventional Radiofrequency Applications for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Percutaneous and Conventional Radiofrequency Applications for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to compare percutaneous and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of knee osteoarthritic pain.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It mostly affects the weight-bearing joints, and in this respect, the knee joint is one of the joints that is most affected.
Radiofrequency (RF) treatment has been used for several painful conditions such as trigeminal neuralgia, cancer pain, and spinal pain. To destroy nerves or disrupt the transmission of pain signals, originally using producing heat lesions, RF current is applied to the trigeminal ganglion, the spinothalamic tracts of the spinal cord, the medial branches of posterior rami, and the dorsal root ganglion. In addition to these, there have been a few attempts to apply RF current for the treatment of painful conditions of joints of the extremities.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of articular sensory nerves has recently emerged as an attractive and minimally invasive approach to treat chronic pain due to large-joint osteoarthritis in select patients.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: