Investigating the Accuracy of Conventional vs Digital Impressions and Conventional vs 3D Fabricated Casts in Capturing the Emergence Profile Around Maxillary Anterior Single Implant-supported Crowns
Investigating the Accuracy of Conventional vs Digital Impressions and Conventional vs 3D Fabricated Casts in Capturing the Emergence Profile Around Maxillary Anterior Single Implant-supported Crowns
This study compares conventional impression and cast fabrication to direct/indirect digital scannig and 3D printed casts regarding their accuracy in replicating the peri-implant emergence profile of single implants in the maxillary anterior region (FDI #15-25).
Correct design of the peri-implant emergence profile (EP) is crucial for maintaining the health of the supracrestal complex and long-term success of the implant implant-prosthodontics. After its formation with a provisional restoration, its shape needs to be transferred to the final restoration via conventional elastomeric or digital (direct/indirect) impression taking.
Our aims are to investigate around maxillary anterior single implants in patients with thick gingival phenotype:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
mikulas.krisztina1@semmelweis.hu+3614591500 ext. 59115
qian.xinyi@semmelweis.hu+3614591500 ext. 59313
Budapest, Pest County 1088, Hungary
mikulas.krisztina1@semmelweis.hu3614591500 ext. 59115
qian.xinyi@semmelweis.hu3614591500 ext. 59313