Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the response of Explicit Motor Imagery interventions in patients suffering Persistent Pelvic Pain. The main question it aims to answer is:
• Does the modality of application of Explicit Motor Imagery, either through visual or auditory stimuli, influence the response in patients suffering Persistent Pelvic Pain?
Participants will receive an online Explicit Motor Imagery program either through visual inputs or auditory inputs. They will be instructed to follow the program en register their response.
Researchers will compare visual Explicit Motor Imagery and auditory Explicit Motor Imagery to see if different inputs generate different responses in patients suffering Persistent Pelvic Pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Explicit Motor Imagery | Experimental | 6 exercises of Explicit Motor Imagery, administered on alternate days, using visual inputs in the form of images. |
|
| Auditory Explicit Motor Imagery | Experimental | 6 exercises of Explicit Motor Imagery, administered on alternate days, using auditory inputs in the form of audio recordings. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual | Other | Delivery of images to conduct several exercises of Explicit Motor Imagery |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical Rating Scale | Self-administered scale that requires the patient to rate their pain intensity on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. | Baseline to two weeks |
| Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire | Self-administered questionnaire to measure attention to pain. 16- item questionnaire, where each item is scored as a six- point Likert scale that ranges from zero (never) to five (always), resulting in a sum score between zero and 80. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. | Baseline to two weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised | Assesses visual and kinesthetic movement imagery abilities. Self-adminstered instrument comprised of 2 subscales: Visual Imagery (4 items) and Kinesthetic Imagery (4 items). Respondents assign a value from a 7-point scale, which indicates the ease or difficulty with which the movement was seen/felt. Higher scores indicate worse movement imagery abilities. | Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Valencia | Valencia | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39963311 | Derived | Perez-Dominguez B, Arce-Elorza A, Rubio-Garcia I, Diaz-Mohedo E. Response in Patients With Persistent Pelvic Pain to Motor Imagery Through Auditory or Visual Input-A Pilot Randomized Trial. Pain Res Manag. 2025 Feb 10;2025:1412626. doi: 10.1155/prm/1412626. eCollection 2025. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017699 | Pelvic Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Auditory | Other | Delivery of audio recordings to conduct several exercises of Explicit Motor Imagery |
|