Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Use of Letermovir Versus Preemptive Strategy in Kidney Transplant Recipients at Higher Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection: a Prospective Randomized Study
Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Use of Letermovir Versus Preemptive Strategy in Kidney Transplant Recipients at Higher Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection: a Prospective Randomized Study
The two main cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention strategies are prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Prophylaxis effectively prevents CMV infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT), but is associated with high rates of neutropenia and late onset of post-prophylactic disease. In contrast, preemptive therapy has the advantage of leading to lower rates of CMV disease and robust humoral and T-cell responses. It is widely used in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, but is rarely used after solid organ transplant recipients due to logistical considerations.
Oral Letermovir for 84 days is effective in the prophylaxis of CMV infection in high-risk kidney transplant recipients. Oral Letermovir for 84 days, is associated with a lower incidence of CMV infection in high-risk high-risk kidney transplant recipients. In addition, the use of Letermovir is safe and associated with a low incidence of CMV syndrome or disease up to 6 months after after kidney transplantation. Finally, prophylaxis with Letermovir is associated with a lower incidence of discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs, reducing the risk of of clinical and subclinical acute rejection
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
heliotedesco@medfarm.com.br+55 11 5087 8113
Monica.nakamura@hrim.com.br+55 11 5087 8318