Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a non-inferiority, international, controlled trial that aims to evaluate the progression of physicians and residents through an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) clinical simulated scenario. The study's primary objective is to compare the performance outcomes between two groups: participants in the traditional in-person simulation and those immersed in the Augmented Reality (AR) scenario
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Augmented Reality Enhanced Simulation (Treatment group) | Experimental | Participants will experience augmented simulations with a holographic mixed-reality setting based on different workplace scenarios such as medical crisis via Augmented Reality (AR) headset. |
|
| Traditional In Situ Simulation (Control group) | Active Comparator | Participants will experience in-person simulations of different workplace scenarios such as medical error and workplace harassment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augmented Reality simulation | Behavioral | Augmented simulation of medical crisis scenarios |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Technical Skill (TS) and Non Technical Skill (NTS) Performance | Measured with Instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance. The instrument consists of 26 items, which are rated on a scale from +2 to -2. A total assessment score of performance is given based on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) at the end of the instrument. | immediately after simulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reassessment of Non Technical Skill (NTS) with Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) | Measured with individual Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). The BARS scoring system uses four categories assessing situation awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork. The score ranges from 1 and 9 (1 = poor and 9 = excellent) | immediately after simulation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucile Parkard Children's Hospital | Stanford | California | 94304 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| In Person simulation | Behavioral | In Person simulation of medical crisis scenarios |
|
| Evaluation of the AR system's usability | Measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). The scale has 10 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) | immediately after simulation |
| Evaluation of the AR system's ergonomics | Measured with the ISO 9241-400 Assessment of human-ergonomic factors. The scale has 6 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) | immediately after simulation |