Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for tumors of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, duodenum, and ampulla of Vater. With advances in surgical experience and instrumentation, the mortality rate of PD has decreased to below 5% in high-volume pancreatic centers. However, the postoperative complication rate remains high at 25%-50%, limiting the development and application of PD.

The main postoperative complications of PD are postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and biliary leakage (BL). POPF, BL, and the subsequent abdominal infection, PPH, etc. are the main causes of death during hospitalization. Even in large, relatively mature pancreatic centers, the incidence of POPF remains as high as 10%-40%. In recent years, various methods have been used to prevent and treat POPF and BL after PD, such as pancreatic duct stent external drainage and external biliary drainage.

To date, there have been many studies by domestic and foreign scholars on the advantages and disadvantages of biliary and pancreatic duct external drainage versus internal drainage in PD in terms of perioperative POPF incidence, mortality rate, etc., but the research results are not consistent. Overall, pancreatic duct stent external drainage is only recommended for patients with a high risk of pancreatic fistula during PD. Currently, there have been a few relevant studies exploring and verifying the preventive effect of pancreatic duct stent external drainage on pancreatic fistula in patients with high risk of pancreatic fistula. For example, a retrospective study of 98 patients with soft pancreatic parenchyma by Teruyuki Usub et al. found that there was no significant difference between groups with and without pancreatic duct stent in preventing pancreatic fistula. However, due to the low level of evidence, only a few risk factors such as pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct diameter were included, and the risk of POPF was not systematically evaluated. Further clinical exploration and verification are needed. In 2013, Mark P Callery et al. proposed a pancreatic fistula risk score (The fistula risk score, FRS) based on the pancreatic fistula standard defined by the International Pancreatic Fistula Study Group, which included pancreatic texture, pathological type, pancreatic duct diameter, and intraoperative blood loss. This model can be used to systematically and quantitatively evaluate the risk of POPF. Previous studies did not have a clear stratification for patients undergoing pancreatic duct stent external drainage, which may have included too many patients with a low risk of pancreatic fistula, resulting in inaccurate results. Therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent external drainage in preventing clinically relevant pancreatic fistula based on stratification of pancreatic fistula risk and disease type. At the same time, pancreatic juice contains a variety of digestive enzymes, of which pancreatic lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin all need to be activated by bile to play a role in digesting and decomposing fat and protein. Theoretically, biliary and pancreatic juice diversion may be able to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula and its related complications in PD patients.

Thus, the investigators design the present study to evaluate the impact of main pancreatic duct and biliary duct external drainage on postoperative complication, especially POPF.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for tumors of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, duodenum, and ampulla of Vater. With advances in surgical experience and instrumentation, the mortality rate of PD has decreased to below 5% in high-volume pancreatic centers. However, the postoperative complication rate remains high at 25%-50%, limiting the development and application of PD.

The main postoperative complications of PD are postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and biliary leakage (BL). POPF, BL, and the subsequent abdominal infection, PPH, etc. are the main causes of death during hospitalization. Even in large, relatively mature pancreatic centers, the incidence of POPF remains as high as 10%-40%. In recent years, various methods have been used to prevent and treat POPF and BL after PD, such as pancreatic duct stent external drainage and external biliary drainage.

To date, there have been many studies by domestic and foreign scholars on the advantages and disadvantages of biliary and pancreatic duct external drainage versus internal drainage in PD in terms of perioperative POPF incidence, mortality rate, etc., but the research results are not consistent. Overall, pancreatic duct stent external drainage is only recommended for patients with a high risk of pancreatic fistula during PD. Currently, there have been a few relevant studies exploring and verifying the preventive effect of pancreatic duct stent external drainage on pancreatic fistula in patients with high risk of pancreatic fistula. For example, a retrospective study of 98 patients with soft pancreatic parenchyma by Teruyuki Usub et al. found that there was no significant difference between groups with and without pancreatic duct stent in preventing pancreatic fistula. However, due to the low level of evidence, only a few risk factors such as pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct diameter were included, and the risk of POPF was not systematically evaluated. Further clinical exploration and verification are needed. In 2013, Mark P Callery et al. proposed a pancreatic fistula risk score (The fistula risk score, FRS) based on the pancreatic fistula standard defined by the International Pancreatic Fistula Study Group, which included pancreatic texture, pathological type, pancreatic duct diameter, and intraoperative blood loss. This model can be used to systematically and quantitatively evaluate the risk of POPF. Previous studies did not have a clear stratification for patients undergoing pancreatic duct stent external drainage, which may have included too many patients with a low risk of pancreatic fistula, resulting in inaccurate results. Therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent external drainage in preventing clinically relevant pancreatic fistula based on stratification of pancreatic fistula risk and disease type. At the same time, pancreatic juice contains a variety of digestive enzymes, of which pancreatic lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin all need to be activated by bile to play a role in digesting and decomposing fat and protein. Theoretically, biliary and pancreatic juice diversion may be able to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula and its related complications in PD patients.

Thus, the investigators design the present study to evaluate the impact of main pancreatic duct and biliary duct external drainage on postoperative complication, especially POPF.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Signed informed content obtained prior to treatment
• Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Life expectancy ≥12 weeks and ASA score ≤2.
• Based on clinical symptoms, imaging examinations, tumor markers, and other auxiliary examinations, the clinical diagnosis includes but is not limited to tumors of the pancreatic head, ampulla of Vater, duodenum, and distal common bile duct, requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy.
• No serious dysfunction in blood system, heart, lung function, or autoimmune system (refer to the respective diagnostic criteria)
• White blood cell (WBC) ≥ 3 × 109/L; Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 × 109/L; Platelets (PLT) ≥ 100 × 109/L; Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 90 g/L
• Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]) ≤ 2.5 × institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); Total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤ ULN; Creatinine (CRE) ≤ 1.5 × ULN
• Prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.5 × ULN
• Able to comply with research visit plans and other protocol requirements.
• With intermediate or high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) according to alternative fistula risk scoring system (A-FRS)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Cancer in late stage including distant organ metastasis (liver, lung, peritoneum), metastasis to the hilar bile duct and hepatic duct, extensive metastasis to the hepatic portal lymph nodes, tumor invasion of the superior mesenteric artery, celiac trunk, inferior vena cava, or abdominal aorta.
• Heart Failure: Congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart function classification of 3 or 4.
• Uncontrolled Hypertension:
• Renal Failure: Renal failure or insufficiency requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
• Active Infection: Serious active clinical infection (> Grade 2, NCI-CTCAE version 4.0).
• Pregnancy or Lactation: Pregnant or lactating women.
• Major Surgery: Patients who have undergone major surgery within 4 weeks of starting the trial or have not recovered from the side effects of such surgery.
• Other Malignancies: Combined with other malignant tumors (patients who have been cured 3 years ago can be included).
• Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Excluding patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 4 weeks before surgery or with a clear tendency of gastrointestinal bleeding that cannot be corrected by active medical treatment.
• Poor Compliance: Poor compliance, unable or unwilling to sign informed consent.