Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine | OTHER |
| The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province | OTHER |
| Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare pain scores between the two groups to see if peripheral nerve stimulation is effective to patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.
The investigators divide study process into 3 main periods called enrollment/baseline period, treatment period and follow-up period. The treatment period is classified into test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period further.
Enrollment/baseline period This study will be conducted at four clinical trial sites in China with 3 to 6 subjects included in the pretest and the formal trial planned to enroll 56 subjects. All subjects enter screening process after signing the informed consent form (ICF) approved by the ethics committee. Subjects are enrolled who meet inclusion criteria and do not meet any exclusion criteria. Enrolled subjects will undergo vital signs, physical examination, laboratory tests, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain for at least 4 days, Neuropathic Pain Scale (DN4), and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) as part of the screening period assessment prior to electrode implantation.
Treatment period 2.1 Implantation of devices Enrolled subjects are implanted with the percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation system, which was parameterized by the investigator via a programmable controller. Subjects are provided with a "Transcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Remote Control Instruction Manual" to guide them in the proper operation and use of the system.
2.2 Test period Investigators will adjust stimulation parameters and record VAS score under different parameters conditions. The enrolled subjects are provided 1 to 5 stimulation therapy patterns parameterized by investigators after the test.
Then the subjects receive continuous stimulation with parameterized patterns of 7 (±3) days and VAS scores are be recorded every day of 7 days. Subjects will enter next stage if their VAS scores decrease more than 30% from baseline level or withdraw the trial as reduction less than 30% and devices are removed.
2.3 Randomized withdrawal period Subject will be classified into random group. One of the group receiving active stimulation called trial group and another receiving placebo stimulation called control group. Both of two groups are performed stimulation in the next 7 days. The subjects of control group will get active stimulation again as the VAS scores back to and maintain 2 days at baseline level. VAS scores will be recorded every day during this period.
2.4 Observation period The devices are on work until 28th day after the implantation in trial group; stimulators are turned on after randomized withdrawal period until 28th day after the implantation in control group.
All subjects have electrode leads removed on day 28 of implantation or at early withdrawal.
Follow-up period Investigators will begin follow up as the removal of electrode leads or on the day 28 of implantation. Indicators including VAS score will be evaluated and recorded to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation during follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants receiving active electrostimulation after implantation procedure | Experimental | Twenty-eight participants (anticipated) from different 4 hospital in China whose mean VAS scores decreased more than 30% compared with baseline scores after electrode implantation. They will still receive electrostimulation therapy during randomized withdrawal period. |
|
| Participants receiving placebo electrostimulation after implantation procedure | Placebo Comparator | Twenty-eight participants (anticipated) from different 4 hospital in China whose mean VAS scores decreased more than 30% compared with baseline scores after electrode implantation. The electrostimulation of them will be turned off during randomized withdrawal period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active electrostimulation | Device | Maintain the electrical stimulation state, and according to the patient's feeling to set the appropriate stimulation parameter range (pain relief and no obvious numbness and discomfort), the programme will be written into the patient's self-control remote control, by the patient according to their own pain situation for the independent control of the stimulation current. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in mean pain visual analogue scale VAS scores between trial and control groups in the randomised withdrawal period | Researchers will collect visual analogue scale scores of 7 days after the implantation of peripheral nerve stimulation electrode to calculate mean scores of 4 days before randomized withdrawal and evaluate the difference in pain improvement of peripheral nerve stimulation between the two groups (trial and control group) by analyzing the mean change in VAS scores during randomized withdrawal period. | every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period) |
| Visual simulation assessment scale collects pain scores after peripheral electrode placement | Researchers collected daily pain scores from the day of peripheral nerve stimulation electrode implantation until removal using the VAS pain scale, as well as pain scores on the 14th day after electrode removal. | Every day from 7 to 28 days after electrode implantation, as well as the 14th day after electrode removal |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of subjects whose pain relief more than 30% | The VAS scores recorded in pain diary by participants during randomized withdrawal period decreased more 30% than baseline period. | Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period) |
| Proportion of subjects of ideal pain state |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dong Yang, PHD | Contact | 13871230491 | 86 | dongyang118@sina.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology | Recruiting | Wuhan | Hubei | 430022 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17258129 | Result | Mobbs RJ, Nair S, Blum P. Peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain. J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Mar;14(3):216-21; discussion 222-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.007. | |
| 21422774 | Result | Al-Jehani H, Jacques L. Peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic neurogenic pain. Prog Neurol Surg. 2011;24:27-40. doi: 10.1159/000323017. Epub 2011 Mar 21. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo electrostimulation | Device | No actual electrostimulation |
|
The VAS scores recorded in pain diary by participants during test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period less than forty millimeters. |
| Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period) |
| Sleep-related assessment after electrostimulation | The number of awakenings in sleep diary by participants during test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period. | Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period) |
| Change of life quality after electrostimulation | The subjects will be asked to fulfill the Mos 36-item Short Form Health Survey with assistance of clinical physician. | 4 days before electrode implantation, 7, 14, 21, 28 days after electrode implantation, and 14 days after electrode removal. |
| Analgesic medications | Participants themselves record the analgesic medications of name, dosage, numbers, routine and duration after peripheral nerve stimulation. | Every day from 4 days before electrode implantation to 14 days after electrode removal. |
| Stability of external assistant devices | The stability is assessed with failure rate which defined as number of failures divided by total number of uses. | Every day from the 1st to 28th day after electrode implantation, as well as the 14th day after electrode removal. |
| Questionnaire survey equipment satisfaction | A questionnaire survey (0-10 points, 0 points very dissatisfied, 10 points very satisfied) was conducted for each surgeon on the ease of operation of the product and the reasons for dissatisfaction were recorded; a questionnaire survey (0-10 points, 0 points very dissatisfied, 10 points very satisfied) was conducted for each subject on the comfort and ease of use of the equipment and the reasons for dissatisfaction were recorded. | On the first day of electrode implantation and the day of electrode removal (remove the electrode 28 days after surgery). |
| 22151211 | Result | Weiner RL, Reed KL. Peripheral neurostimulation for control of intractable occipital neuralgia. Neuromodulation. 1999 Jul;2(3):217-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00217.x. |
| 18164488 | Result | Slavin KV. Peripheral nerve stimulation for neuropathic pain. Neurotherapeutics. 2008 Jan;5(1):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.11.005. |
| 30954936 | Result | Gilmore C, Ilfeld B, Rosenow J, Li S, Desai M, Hunter C, Rauck R, Kapural L, Nader A, Mak J, Cohen S, Crosby N, Boggs J. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic neuropathic postamputation pain: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jun;44(6):637-645. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100109. Epub 2019 Apr 5. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D051474 | Neuralgia, Postherpetic |
| D014277 | Trigeminal Neuralgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009437 | Neuralgia |
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D020433 | Trigeminal Nerve Diseases |
| D005156 | Facial Neuralgia |
| D005155 | Facial Nerve Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D003389 | Cranial Nerve Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided