Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study type: Prospective, double-blinded, double arm, cross-over, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Brief protocol:
Postoperative week 0-2 -> Conventional parameters (parameters tested during trial period)
Postoperative week 2-6 -> Sham stimulation (2 weeks) and paresthesia-free stimulation (2 weeks) double-blind crossover design
Postoperative week 6 - month 12 -> Parameters that patients feel more benefit from
Background:
Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation (PNFS) has been utilized for the treatment of facial pain for around 60 years, and the commercial devices needed to deliver PNFS have been available for around 30 years. The safety and efficacy of the procedure has been demonstrated by various uncontrolled observational studies. It serves as a part of daily neurosurgical practice for selected patients in UHN Toronto Western Hospital. This therapeutic modality involves subcutaneous implantation of electrodes in the vicinity of trigeminal nerve branches and application of electrical current using a permanently implanted pulse generator (IPG). Similar to other forms of neuromodulation, PNFS is non-ablative, reversible, adjustable and associated with a relatively low risk of severe complications. A meta-analysis of paresthesia-inducing (PI) PFNS studies in the literature revealed a treatment efficacy of 75% decrease in VAS scores (mean difference: -6.32 out of 10) with PNFS utilization for facial pain. (PMID: 35180702)
Study design:
Patients who underwent a successful unilateral PNFS implantation surgery (trial and permanent implantation) for a facial pain syndrome as a standard of care treatment, will be screened for inclusion after permanent implantable pulse generator (IPG) implantation. Upon consent, the investigators will set up participants' IPG to deliver stimulation with parameters tested during the trial period (paresthesia-inducing parameters) for 2 weeks. The participants will come back to hospital at postoperative week 2 and will be randomized (1:1 ratio) between the two arms of the study (Group 1= sham, Group 2= paresthesia-free (PF) stimulation). Each participant will consecutively experience all two stimulation groups by 2-week periods in a crossover design. Both participants and clinical investigators that will assess the pain will be blind during the study period (between postoperative week 2 and 6). After 6 weeks, the treatment arms will be merged and all the participants will receive any stimulation parameter that they feel more benefit from ("best" parameter). Outcomes will be assessed 6 and 12 months post-operatively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paresthesia-Free Stimulation | Experimental | Duration: 2 weeks |
|
| Sham Stimulation | Sham Comparator | Duration: 2 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paresthesia-free Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation | Other | High frequency and sub-paresthesia threshold intensity parameters will be used for paresthesia-free stimulation of trigeminal nerve branches. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score Change | VAS score change between sham condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6) and Paresthesia-free stimulation condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6) VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 mm (or 0 to 10 cm). Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative week 2 to week 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score Change | Score changes between sham condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6), Paresthesia-free stimulation condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6) and Paresthesia-inducing stimulation condition (postop week 0-2) Non-independent within-group comparison VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 mm (or 0 to 10 cm). Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative week 0 to week 6 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Kim | Contact | +14166035800 | jacob.kim@uhn.ca | |
| Can Sarica, MD | Contact | +14377772269 | can.sarica@uhn.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mojgan Hodaie, MD, MSc | University of Toronto | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network | Recruiting | Toronto | Ontario | M5T 2S8 | Canada |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014277 | Trigeminal Neuralgia |
| D005157 | Facial Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020433 | Trigeminal Nerve Diseases |
| D005156 | Facial Neuralgia |
| D005155 | Facial Nerve Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sham stimulation | Other | Stimulation will be turned off. |
|
| Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score change | Score changes between sham condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6), Paresthesia-free stimulation condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6) and Paresthesia-inducing stimulation condition (postop week 0-2) Non-independent within-group comparison BNI score ranges from 1 to 5. Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative week 0 to week 6 |
| Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score change | Score changes between sham condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6), Paresthesia-free stimulation condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6) and Paresthesia-inducing stimulation condition (postop week 0-2) Non-independent within-group comparison BPI-Pain Severity Score and BPI-Pain Interference Score range from 0 to 10. Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative week 0 to week 6 |
| Clinician and Patient Global Impression of Change Scale and Patient satisfaction scale score change | Score changes between sham condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6), Paresthesia-free stimulation condition (postop week 2-4 or postop week 4-6) and Paresthesia-inducing stimulation condition (postop week 0-2) Non-independent within-group comparison Clinician and Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (range from 1 to 7) and Patient satisfaction scale (range from 1 to 5). Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative week 0 to week 6 |
| Adverse effect Profile | Adverse effect Profile | Postoperative week 0 to month 12 |
| Ratio of patients who chose paresthesia-free or paresthesia-inducing stimulation at week 6, month 6 and 12 | paresthesia-free or paresthesia-inducing stimulation | Postoperative week 6, month 6 and 12 |
| fMRI BOLD signal change | IPG ON>OFF BOLD signal change (both paresthesia-free and Paresthesia-inducing conditions will be tested) | Between postoperative month 6 and 12 |
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score Change | Score changes between baseline and postoperative 6 and 12 months VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 mm (or 0 to 10 cm). Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative month 6 and 12 |
| Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score change | Score changes between baseline and postoperative 6 and 12 months BNI score ranges from 1 to 5. Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative month 6 and 12 |
| Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score change | Score changes between baseline and postoperative 6 and 12 months BPI-Pain Severity Score and BPI-Pain Interference Score range from 0 to 10. Higher score is worse outcome. | Postoperative month 6 and 12 |
| Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke | Recruiting | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1H 5N4 | Canada |
|
| D009057 |
| Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D003389 | Cranial Nerve Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |