Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Morpheus 8 Body 40-pin tip up to 7mm depth Applicator for subdermal treatment of cellulite appearance, skin laxity, and subcutaneous fat deposits.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Morpheus 8 Body 40-pin tip up to 7mm depth Applicator for subdermal treatment of cellulite appearance, skin laxity, and subcutaneous fat deposits.
Prospective, open-label, baseline-controlled, clinical study to evaluate the Morpheus8 device for treatment of cellulite, skin laxity, and subcutaneous fat deposits of the thighs.
Eligible subjects will undergo two treatments with the Morpheus8 device using the 3, 5 7 mm depths or sequential (Burst) mode, based on the treating physician's discretion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Treatment | Experimental | Eligible subjects will undergo two treatments with the Morpheus8 device using the 3, 5 7 mm depths or sequential (Burst) mode, based on the treating physician's discretion. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device treatment | Device | InMode RF system with Morpheus8 Body (up to 7mm depth) Eligible subjects will undergo two treatments with the Morpheus8 device using the 3, 5 7 mm depths or sequential (Burst) mode, based on the treating physician's discretion..each subject is approximately 9 months (including screening, two treatments (2 months apart) and 3 follow-up visits at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cellulite assessment based on Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale | Cellulite assessment based on Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (using pre (baseline) and post treatment Standard medical photography, having at least mean of one-unit improvement (1-point score reduction). 0 - None - No evident cellulite
| 6 Months |
| Cellulite assessment based on DiBernardo Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale | Cellulite assessment based on DiBernardo Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale using pre (baseline) and post-treatment Standard medical photography, having at least a mean of one-unit improvement (1-point score reduction). This 5-point photo numeric scale rates cellulite severity from "0" (none) to "4" (severe) from a clinician's perspective | 6 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subject assessment of improvement | Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change | 1 month |
| Subject assessment of improvement |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse Event rate | Rate of all device and procedure related adverse events (AE's) and serious adverse events (SAE's) occurring during the study | For the duration of the study |
| Pain Scale | Pain assessment will be performed immediately post treatment using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain 10 - worst possible pain |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
40 female subjects aged 18-65 seeking cellulite treatment. Treatment areas include: thighs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| . Macrene Alexiades, md | Principal Investigator | |
| Rod Rohrich, md | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center of New York | New York | New York | 10028 | United States | ||
| Dallas Plastic Surgeon |
Not provided
Prospective, open-label clinical study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change |
| 3 months |
| Subject assessment of improvement | Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change | 6 months |
| Subject assessment of satisfaction | Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: +2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied | 1 month |
| Subject assessment of satisfaction | Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: +2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied | 3 months |
| Subject assessment of satisfaction | Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: +2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied | 6 months |
| Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvemen | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using Global aesthetic improvement 4-point grading scale (0=No tightening/firmness, 1= Slightly visible tightening/firmness, 2= Visible tightening/firmness, 3= Very visible tightening/firmness) at all follow up visits. | 1 month |
| Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No difference | 3 months |
| Investigator assessment of the skin appearance | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits: 4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No difference | 6 months |
| Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment | Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%) | 1 Month |
| Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment | Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%) | 3 Months |
| Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment | Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%) | 6 Months |
| Immediately post each procedure |
| Dallas |
| Texas |
| 75225 |
| United States |