Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of the Profound System for the Treatment of Cellulite.
Up to 60 healthy female volunteers, seeking cellulite treatment, 18 to 60 years of age from up to 3 investigational sites.
Prospective, open-label, baseline-controlled, two arms, randomized, clinical study to evaluate the Profound device using the Dermal and SubQ Cartridges for minimally-invasive treatment of the upper thighs and buttocks cellulite appearance.
The treatment areas of the study subjects will be divided into two arms:
Methodology described in protocol to evaluate efficacy of treatments will be carried out at each visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profound treatment to small areas | Experimental | Single Profound treatment with the Dermal and/or SubQ cartridges to bra bulge, above the knees or upper arms |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profound | Device | The main intent of the Profound Dermal and Subdermal cartridges for cellulite treatment is to utilize a minimally-invasive approach to directly deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy into tissue through pairs of micro-electrode needles and use temperature sensors within the needles to reliably create fractional thermal injuries within the skin. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in Global Aesthetic Appearance of Cellulite in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations | Evaluate the improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite in treated areas following a single dermal and/or subcutaneous treatment with Profound, as assessed by study investigators at 1,3 and 6 months post treatment visit. Investigators used the following scale: 0=No Change; 1= 1-24% improvement; 2=25-49% improvement; 3=50-74% improvement; 4=75-100% improvement. The analysis calculates the improvement over 25% (grades 2-4) | 1,3 and 6 months post-treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in Skin Tightening/Laxity in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations | Evaluate the improvement in skin tightening in treated areas following a single dermal and/or subcutaneous treatment with Profound, as assessed by study investigators at 1 and 6 months post treatment visit. Investigators used the following scale: (0) No tightening/firmness; (1) Slightly visible tightening/firmness; (2) Visible tightening/firmness; (3) Very visible tightening/firmness. The analysis calculates the skin tightening improvement graded: (2) Visible tightening/firmness and (3) Very visible tightening/firmness |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Girish Munavalli, MD | Laser & Vein Specialists of the Carolinas | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macrene Alexiades | New York | New York | 10028 | United States | ||
| Girish Munavalli |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18489274 | Background | Rawlings AV. Cellulite and its treatment. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006 Jun;28(3):175-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2494.2006.00318.x. | |
| 11204512 | Background | Rossi AB, Vergnanini AL. Cellulite: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000 Jul;14(4):251-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00016.x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treated on the Suprapatellar | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both left and right sides) |
| FG001 | Treated on the Upper Arms | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both left and right sides) |
| FG002 | Treated on the Braline | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both left and right sides) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Subjects treated with Profound SubQ, Dermal or both cartridges. Each subject was treated in two contralateral areas. If each area was treated differently (e.g. different cartridge or parameters used) it was assessed separately.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treated on the Suprapatellar | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side) |
| BG001 | Treated on the Upper Arms |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Improvement in Global Aesthetic Appearance of Cellulite in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations | Evaluate the improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite in treated areas following a single dermal and/or subcutaneous treatment with Profound, as assessed by study investigators at 1,3 and 6 months post treatment visit. Investigators used the following scale: 0=No Change; 1= 1-24% improvement; 2=25-49% improvement; 3=50-74% improvement; 4=75-100% improvement. The analysis calculates the improvement over 25% (grades 2-4) | Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters | Posted | Count of Units | Investigator Assessments | 1,3 and 6 months post-treatment | Investigator Assessments | Investigator Assessments |
|
The period of time over which adverse event data were collected is from treatment visit until 6 month post treatment
The number and severity of adverse events following a single dermal and subcutaneous treatment, with Profound for the Suprapatellar, upper arms or braline, were evaluated at 1-week post treatment, 1 month, 3 and 6 months following the treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treated on the Suprapatellar | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side) |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruising | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Mild bruising reported on 1 week FU visit, located at the right knee. Recovered after 2 days without intervention. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Clinical Marketing | Candela Corporation | (949) 599-7646 | doranr@candelamedical.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 17, 2017 | Mar 5, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000071697 | Cellulite |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012877 | Skin Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment visit. |
| Investigator Satisfaction - by Questionnaire | Evaluate Investigator satisfaction at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit, using a satisfaction scale [(-2) Very dissatisfied, (-1) Dissatisfied, (0) No opinion, (1) Satisfied, (2) Very satisfied]. The analysis quantify investigator satisfaction (grades 1-2) | 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit |
| Subject Satisfaction and Improvement - by Questionnaire | Evaluate subject satisfaction at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit, using a satisfaction and improvement scale [(-2) Very dissatisfied, (-1) Dissatisfied, (0) No opinion, (1) Satisfied, (2) Very satisfied]. The analysis quantify subject satisfaction (grades 1-2) | 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit |
| Charlotte |
| North Carolina |
| 28270 |
| United States |
| 25915628 | Background | Alexiades M, Berube D. Randomized, blinded, 3-arm clinical trial assessing optimal temperature and duration for treatment with minimally invasive fractional radiofrequency. Dermatol Surg. 2015 May;41(5):623-32. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000347. |
| 30222637 | Background | Alexiades M, Munavalli G, Goldberg D, Berube D. Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial of a Temperature-Controlled Subcutaneous Microneedle Fractional Bipolar Radiofrequency System for the Treatment of Cellulite. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Oct;44(10):1262-1271. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001593. |
| 33764552 | Derived | Alexiades M, Munavalli GS. Single Treatment Protocol With Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency for Treatment of Body Skin Laxity and Fat Deposits. Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Oct;53(8):1026-1031. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23397. Epub 2021 Mar 25. |
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side)
| BG002 | Treated on the Braline | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side) |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Number Areas |
|
| Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years | Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants | Participants |
|
| OG000 |
| Treated on the Suprapatellar |
Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges above the knees areas (on both the left and the right side) |
| OG001 | Treated on the Upper Arms | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side) |
| OG002 | Treated on the Braline | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side) |
|
|
| Secondary | Improvement in Skin Tightening/Laxity in Treated Areas, as Assessed by Study Investigator Evaluations | Evaluate the improvement in skin tightening in treated areas following a single dermal and/or subcutaneous treatment with Profound, as assessed by study investigators at 1 and 6 months post treatment visit. Investigators used the following scale: (0) No tightening/firmness; (1) Slightly visible tightening/firmness; (2) Visible tightening/firmness; (3) Very visible tightening/firmness. The analysis calculates the skin tightening improvement graded: (2) Visible tightening/firmness and (3) Very visible tightening/firmness | Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters | Posted | Count of Units | Investigator Assessments | 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment visit. | Investigator Assessments | Investigator Assessments |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Investigator Satisfaction - by Questionnaire | Evaluate Investigator satisfaction at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit, using a satisfaction scale [(-2) Very dissatisfied, (-1) Dissatisfied, (0) No opinion, (1) Satisfied, (2) Very satisfied]. The analysis quantify investigator satisfaction (grades 1-2) | Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters | Posted | Count of Units | Investigator Assessments | 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit | Investigator Assessments | Investigator Assessments |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject Satisfaction and Improvement - by Questionnaire | Evaluate subject satisfaction at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit, using a satisfaction and improvement scale [(-2) Very dissatisfied, (-1) Dissatisfied, (0) No opinion, (1) Satisfied, (2) Very satisfied]. The analysis quantify subject satisfaction (grades 1-2) | Suprapatellar areas- 17 subjects, 8 subjects (16 areas) had one assessment for both sides treated with the same parameters. Upper Arms- 10 Subjects had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters (1 subject dropped after 1 wk FU). Braline areas- 3 subjects, one subject had one assessment for both sides treated with same parameters | Posted | Count of Units | Subject Assessments | 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment visit | Subject Assessments | Subject Assessments |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 1 |
| 17 |
| EG001 | Treated on the Upper Arms | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the upper arms (on both the left and the right side) | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| EG002 | Treated on the Braline | Subjects treated with the Profound Dermal, SubQ or both cartridges on the braline areas (on both the left and the right side) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
|
| Itching | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Mild itching reported at the 1 week FU, located at the right and left knees. Recovered after 2 days without intervention. |
|
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Visible + very visible tightening at 6-month FU |
|
|
| Investigator Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 6mo FU |
|
|
| Subject Satisfaction Grades 1-2 at 6mo FU |
|