Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Management of pilon fractures with versus without fibula fixation
Comparing results with or without fibular fixation in :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Management of pilon fractures with fibula fixation |
| |
| 2 | Management of pilon fracture without fibula fixation |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic compression plate | Device | Fixation of fibula in some cases with dynamic compression plate |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture healing and bone union | by RUST score | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidece and rate of complications | Incidence and rate of complications (e.g. non-union, skin breakdown , infections and postraumatic malaligment) by AOFAS score | Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Management of pilon fractures with versus withot fibula fixation: prospective controlled study
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mina Mofdy | Contact | 01286998347 | minamofdy55@gmail.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided