Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-A01735-48 | Other Identifier | 2017-A01735-48 |
Not provided
Not provided
recrutment problems
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The assessment consists in comparing the osteosynthesis plate with minimally invasive technique versus open reduction and internal fixation.
The aim of study is to compare (period of bandage, efficacy, safety), these two types of surgical technique by using a prospective, randomized analysis.
Several surgical techniques exist and among plate osteosynthesis, there is a minimally invasive method and the open reduction method.
Investigators think that the minimally invasive method with intern plate is more efficient than the open reduction method.
These techniques may better preserve perifracture soft tissues, hematoma. It may lead to a smaller muscle detachment.
The minimally invasive technique allows a more efficient vascularization of the fracture site, what would increase bone healing and the functional prognosis of tibial pilon lesions.
It's all these issues investigators would like to assess with a randomized study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| minimally invasive method | Active Comparator | The patients are treated with minimally invasive method |
|
| open reduction method | Active Comparator | The patients are treated with open reduction method |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| minimally invasive method | Procedure | type of surgical technique |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Healing | Measure of the duration of the bandage with index form of follow-up the state cutaneous of the wound. This measure was a number. | at 45 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AOFAS clinical score | American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society was a standard method of reporting clinical status of the ankle and foot. The systems incorporate both subjective and objective factors into numerical scales to describe function, alignment, and pain. The score varies between 0 and 100, more the value is better brought up is the score | pre op, 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roger ERIVAN | University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Clermont-Ferrand | Clermont-Ferrand | 63003 | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
No masking
Not provided
| open reduction method |
| Procedure |
type of surgical technique |
|
| Nach mazur and al score | The Nach mazur grading system uses 100 points to assess pain, function while wearing shoes and the range of ankle movement. The maximum score a patient with a solid ankle fusion. | pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| The Foot & Ankle Disability Index | The Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) was designed to assess functional limitations related to foot and ankle conditions. Subjective reports of function are classified as generic or specific measures, which include condition-specific, population-specific, and patient-specific instruments. The FADI have a total point value of 100 points, more the value is better brought up is the score | pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Pain | THE VISUAL SIMILAR SCALE is auto-completed. For the intensity of pain, the scale varies between " no pain " (the score of 0) and " the pain so badly as he could be " or " the worst conceivable pain " (the score of 10) | pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Complications | list of the complications | pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months |
| Radiologic evaluation | Radiologic evaluation | pre op 45 days, 3, 6 and 12 months |