Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Control groups will be formed in the 2-12 age group using standard manual toothbrushes, and the effectiveness of 360-degree bristle toothbrushes will be compared.
Study design: Experimental study
In this randomized controlled, single-brushing study, children were assigned to a treatment sequence involving a 360-degree toothbrush and a control brush.
Subjects were randomly assigned to a treatment sequence involving a 360-degree toothbrush and a classical manual control toothbrush. Parents brushed the teeth of their children aged 2-5 years, whereas children aged 6-12 years brushed their own teeth under the supervision of clinic staff, unaided by a mirror. Clinical examination of each participant was carried out by the principal investigator. Assessments were done pre- and post-brushing using the "Silness and Löe Plaque Index" (PI), Gingival Index (GI), and the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S). Plaque indices were expressed as means and standard deviations (SD). Within each toothbrush group, the follow-up scores were analyzed using a paired t-test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| control group | Experimental | A control group will be formed using a manual brush with a classic head. |
|
| study group | Experimental | A study group will be formed using a 360-degree bristle brush. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| standart manual toothbrush | Device | Device on plaque removal efficacy |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Within-Treatment Whole-Mouth Differences (vs Baseline) - Plaque removal | Mean Change from baseline (pre-brushing to post-brushing) in plaque score after single supervised use based on all surfaces of the whole mouth measured. | 2 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marmara University | Recruiting | Maltepe | Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42143742 | Derived | Sivet EA, Atmaca N, Niyazova H, Yilmaz A, Durmus B, Kargul B. Comparative Effectiveness of a 360-Degree Round-Head Toothbrush and a Conventional Manual Toothbrush Among Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2026 May 17. doi: 10.1111/idh.70093. Online ahead of print. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003773 | Dental Plaque |
| D005891 | Gingivitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003741 | Dental Deposits |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
single blinded randomized control trial
Not provided
Not provided
The dental investigator who performed the oral health assessment for dentition status and plaque status was blinded during the intervention.
| 360 degree toothbrush |
| Device |
Device on plaque removal efficacy |
|
| D005882 |
| Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |