Comparison of Three Methods of Inducing Liver Hypertrophy Before Resection - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Three Methods of Inducing Liver Hypertrophy Before Resection - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Liver resection is the treatment of choice in patients with malignant liver lesions. Unfortunately, the surgery is not always an option, as in same patients the future remnant liver (FRL) is too small to supply all the functions. Therefore, some additional methods have been proposed to increase the size of the FRL.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of three methods of increasing the future remnant liver - Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) - embolization of one of the portal branches; Liver Vein Deprivation (LVD) - embolization both of the portal branch as well as the hepatic vein; and partial ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) - ligation of portal vein branch with partial liver transection.
The efficacy of those three methods will be assessed both by analyzing the volumetric increase (by computer tomography scans) and by functional increase (by 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy). Functional assessment of the liver hypertrophy seems to be of crucial importance, as some of the previous studies suggest that there might be a significant discrepancy in the increase of size comparing to the increase of function.
This is a prospective, interventional randomized study. The study group (154 patients) will consist of patients being considered as candidates for major hepatic resection, after inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver.
The primary study hypothesis is greater efficacy of ALPPS in preparing patients for large hepatic resection by inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver, as compared both to PVE and LVD.
In case of unsuccessful induction of hypertrophy by the embolization techniques, patients may be qualified to rescue ALPPS procedure.
Primary end-point:
Percentage of patients with successful resection (patients, who gained sufficient increase of the FRL to proceed to the liver resection) with no post-surgical 90-day mortality.
Secondary end-points:
Patient will be randomly assigned to the three study groups. All patients will undergo an abdominal contrast enhanced computed tomography and 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy prior to the first stage of treatment. During the first stage of treatment, patients will undergo, according to their group:
All patients will be monitored for surgical and 90-day complications. The volume increase after first stage of treatment, the functional increase after first stage of treatment, percentage of patients successfully proceeding to the second stage of treatment and complication rate will be calculated.
The percentage of patients with complications >= 3 degree in Clavien-Dindo classification and CCI index for each patient will be calculated.
Furthermore, the blood test results will be assessed to search for associations with patients' outcomes. Any possible differences in terms of baseline patients characteristics between groups will be addressed.
Statistical analysis will be performed using U Mann-Whitney test, exact Fisher's test, logistic regression, general linear models, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. All three groups will be assessed in terms of occurrence of primary and secondary end-points.
Liver resection is the treatment of choice in patients with malignant liver lesions. Unfortunately, the surgery is not always an option, as in same patients the future remnant liver (FRL) is too small to supply all the functions. Therefore, some additional methods have been proposed to increase the size of the FRL. Among the most widely used ones are: Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) - embolization of one of the portal branches; Liver Vein Deprivation (LVD) - embolization both of the portal branch as well as the hepatic vein and partial ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy) - ligation of portal vein branch with partial liver transection.
However, for the time being none of this methods has been proven to provide superior results in comparison to other, and all of them are widely used in different centers. Most of the previously published papers were retrospective in nature and as for now there was no randomized trial conducted to compare all three of them. What is more, most of the previously published papers focused on the volumetric increase, based solely on the computed tomography analysis. The most important is however the functional increase, not the increase in size. The functional increase can be assessed in the 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy, which enables to assess the liver function in a chosen part of the liver.
Some of the previously published papers indicate that there might be a significant discrepancy in the increase of size comparing to the increase of function, which is critically important in the clinical practice.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of three methods of increasing the future remnant liver - PVE, LVD and ALPPS in patients in whom liver resection is considered.
METHODS:
This is a prospective, interventional randomized study. Patients will be randomly assigned to three groups in a 12:71:71 ratio: PVE, LVD and ALPPS groups, respectively.
Randomization will be performed directly after recruitment. The study group will consist of patients being considered as candidates for major hepatic resection, after inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Hypothesis and study group:
The primary study hypothesis is greater efficacy of ALPPS in preparing patients for large hepatic resection by inducing hypertrophy of the future remnant liver, as compared both to PVE and LVD. Basing on previously published studies following success rates (as percentage of patients completing the second stage of treatment, the hepatic resection) have been assumed: 57% for PVE, 73% for LVD and 91% for ALPPS.
Assuming the thresholds for type I and type II error of 5% and 20% respectively, the calculated size of the study group should be 154 patients, more specifically 12 in the PVE group, 71 in the LVD group and 71 in the ALPPS group.
Special surveillance will be applied to patients in the PVE group and in case of low efficacy (<50%) in the first 6 patients, randomization to this group will be withheld.
Moreover, in case of unsuccessful induction of hypertrophy by the embolization techniques, patients may be qualified to rescue ALPPS procedure.
Primary end-point:
Percentage of patients with successful resection (patients, who gained sufficient increase of the FRL to proceed to the liver resection) with no post-surgical 90-day mortality.
Secondary end-points:
Patient will be randomly assigned to the three study groups. All patients will undergo an abdominal contrast enhanced computed tomography and 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy prior to the first stage of treatment. During the first stage of treatment, patients will undergo, according to their group:
Computed tomography scans and scintigraphy will be repeated at day 7, 14 and 21 after the first stage of treatment. The second stage of treatment, the liver resection, will be performed after achievement of sufficient mebrofenin clearance rate (>=2,69%/min/m2). In case of failure to reach the desired clearance rate, the measurements will be continued every 7 days up to date 42. In case of uncertainty and discrepancy between the volumetric assessment in the computed tomography scan and the mebrofenin scintigraphy, it will be allowed to proceed to stage two (partial hepatectomy) after joint consultation of at least 3 hepatobiliary surgeons, 1 radiologist and 1 nuclear medicine specialist.
Routine blood tests such as morphology, serum bilirubin and creatinine concentration, transaminase activity, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase or INR will be performed according to the standard procedure in the Department of Liver, Transplant and General Surgery, namely at day 0 and 1 and every 2-3 days or more frequent in the next days, depending on the patient clinical status. An additional blood sample will be collected from patients (after receiving and additional informed consent from the patient) and will be stored in the biobank (according to "Quality Standards for Polish Biobanks" v.2.00). The samples will be stored at the LBBK biobank at Medical University of Warsaw.
All patients will be monitored for surgical and 90-day complications. The volume increase after first stage of treatment, the functional increase after first stage of treatment, percentage of patients successfully proceeding to the second stage of treatment and complication rate will be calculated.
The percentage of patients with complications >= 3 degree in Clavien-Dindo classification and CCI index for each patient will be calculated.
Furthermore, the blood test results will be assessed to search for associations with patients' outcomes. Any possible differences in terms of baseline patients characteristics between groups will be addressed.
Statistical analysis will be performed using U Mann-Whitney test, exact Fisher's test, logistic regression, general linear models, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. All three groups will be assessed in terms of occurrence of primary and secondary end-points.
The study is designed to last 6 years, from 1st June 2023 to 31st May 2029. The firsts four months are planned for the initiation of the study, the following months for recruitment, intervention and observation and the last two months for analyzing the results.
After discharge from the hospital, 2 control visit will be scheduled for each patient, 30 and 90 days after the liver resection. Further treatment will be continued in local oncological centers.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
karolina.grat@wum.edu.pl+48225992300
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship 02-097, Poland
karolina.grat@wum.edu.pl+48225992300