Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| UF 7595 | Other Identifier | UH Montpellier |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The hypothesis is that liver venous deprivation (LVD) could strongly improve hypertrophy of the future remnant liver (FRL) at 3 weeks, as compared to portal vein embolization (PVE) in patient with liver metastases from colo-rectal origin considered as resectable.
Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to generate hypertrophy of the nonembolized lobe in patients undergoing major hepatectomy in order to prevent small-for-size remnant liver resulting in post-operative liver insufficiency.
Although PVE is a safe and effective procedure, it does not always induce sufficient hypertrophy of the future remnant liver (FRL) even after a long time. In case of insufficient liver regeneration following PVE, some authors suggested to embolize hepatic vein(s) (Hwang, Ann Surg 2009).
Interestingly, the sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FRL. Although attractive, this approach requires two different procedures and does not spare time as compared to PVE alone.
To shorten and optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery,the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD) technique that combines both PVE and HVE during the same procedure was developed.
The aim of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FRL volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-scan.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| portal vein embolization | Active Comparator | Liver preparation before major hepatectomy : portal vein embolization (PVE) in patient with liver metastases from colo-rectal origin considered as resectable. |
|
| liver venous deprivation | Experimental | Liver preparation before major hepatectomy : Patients with the liver venous deprivation (LVD) technique that combines both PVE and hepatic vein embolization (HVE) during the same procedure. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver preparation before major hepatectomy | Procedure | Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus Portal vein embolization, also called venous deprivation OR portal vein embolization. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| increase in volume of the future remnant liver (FRL) | The primary outcomes is to compare the increase in volume of the future remnant liver (FRL) | at 3 weeks after liver venous deprivation (LVD) or portal vein embolization (PVE) using MRI or CT-scan |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerance | Toxicities are evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03 published 14 June 2010 | between the day of liver preparation and 90 days after surgery |
| Post-operative mortality | Post-operative mortality defined as any death within 90 days after surgery or within the hospital stay |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Liver metastases from colo-rectal origin considered as resectable (as validated by a multidisciplinary committee with at least one senior hepatic surgeon) provided sufficient FRL volume
Percentage of FRL volume < 30%
Age ≥ 18 years
General health status World Health Organisation 0,1
Estimated life expectancy > 3 months
Patients whose biological parameters are :
Reference liver CT-Scan or MRI done during the 30 days preceding PVE or LVD.
Written informed consent
National health insurance cover
Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Montpellier | Montpellier | Hérault | 34295 | France | ||
| CHU d'Angers |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32560632 | Derived | Deshayes E, Piron L, Bouvier A, Lapuyade B, Lermite E, Vervueren L, Laurent C, Pinaquy JB, Chevallier P, Dohan A, Rode A, Sengel C, Guillot C, Quenet F, Guiu B. Study protocol of the HYPER-LIV01 trial: a multicenter phase II, prospective and randomized study comparing simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization to portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases. BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07065-z. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 90 days after surgery |
| Post-operative morbidity | Post-operative morbidity defined as the percentages of grade I/II/III/IV/V complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification within the 90 days after surgery or within the hospital stay. | 90 days after surgery |
| Post-hepatectomy liver failure | Post-hepatectomy liver failure defined according to the "50-50" criteria or peak bilirubin >7mg/dL. | between the day of the surgery and 90 days after surgery |
| Rate of non-resectability due to insufficient FRL | Rate of non-resectability due to insufficient FRL defined as the percentage of patients for whom resection will be not attempted due to insufficient FRL | between the day of the treatment and the day of the surgery |
| Rate of non-resectability due to tumor progression | Rate of non-resectability due to tumor progression defined as the percentage of patients for whom resection will not be attempted due to tumor progression. | between the day of the treatment and the day of the surgery |
| Rate of per-operative difficulties | Rate of per-operative difficulties defined as the percentage of patients for whom per-operative difficulties are encountered by the surgeon | between the day of the surgery and 90 days after surgery |
| Blood loos, operating time, transfusion | Blood loss are evaluated in mL. Operating time avec evaluated in minutes and transfusion are evaluated by number of packed red blood cells | the day of the surgery |
| R0 resection rate | Rate of R0 resection defined as no microscopic tumor residual | the day of the surgery |
| R1 resection rate | Rate of R1 resection defined as the percentage of patients resected with margin <1mm | the day of the surgery |
| Pre and post-operative liver volumes | Pre and post-operative liver volumes will be evaluated through CT or MRI acquisitions by calculating whole liver, tumor and FRL volumes | Baseline, week 1, week 3 then every 2 weeks until surgery or week 7 and 4 weeks after surgery |
| Recurrence-free survival | Recurrence-free survival defined as the time from date of randomization to date of recurrence or death from their tumor. Patients alive will be censored at the date of last news. | 90 days after surgery |
| Overall survival | Overall survival defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Patients alive will be censored at the date of last news. | Between the liver preparation and 90 days after surgery |
| Evaluation of pre and post-operative liver function | Evaluation of pre and post-operative liver function will be evaluated using 99mTc mebrofenine scintigraphy through SPECT/CT acquisitions by calculating mebrofenin clearance in %/min/m² of whole liver and FRL at the same time points as CT/MRI | Baseline, week 1, week 3 then every 2 weeks until surgery or week 7 and 4 weeks after surgery |
| To search for biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy/regeneration and immune cell response | Biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy/regeneration are evaluated by blood samples and liver biopies | The day of liver preparation, on day 1, day 2 and day 3 after liver preparation and the day of surgery |
| Angers |
| 49933 |
| France |
| Bordeaux University Hospital | Bordeaux | France |
| CHU de Dijon | Dijon | 21079 | France |
| CHU de Grenoble | Grenoble | 38043 | France |
| Hospices Civils de Lyon | Lyon | 69317 | France |
| Centre Léon Berard | Lyon | 69373 | France |
| CHU de Nice | Nice | 06202 | France |
| APHP - Cochin hospital | Paris | France |
| CHU de Poitiers | Poitiers | 80000 | France |
| Hôpital Paul Brousse | Villejuif | 94800 | France |
| Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | 94805 | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided