Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ICAR (Istituto di Calcolo e Reti ad Alte Prestazioni) - CNR (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this trial is to compare the evaluation of 3D liver models visualised as holograms with HoloLens 2 and on digital PDF files in HPB surgical trainees.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Group A analyses 15 patient cases 3D Hologram models (first stage) and after the washout period the same 15 patients cases (anonymised, renamed and shuffled) in liver 3D models on computer monitor visualisation (PDF) (second stage) |
|
| Group B | Experimental | Group B analyses 15 patient cases liver 3D models on computer monitor visualisation (PDF) (first stage) and after the washout period the same 15 patients cases (anonymised, renamed and shuffled) on 3D Hologram models (second stage) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holograms | Other | Clinical decision making based on visualising liver 3D holographic augmented reality liver models |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic and planning accuracy | Correctly identify anatomy and appropriate surgical planning Residents' decision-making accuracy when reviewing patient data and 3D liver models using Holograms or on PDF, measured by comparing their performance. The measurement tool will be a questionnaire consisting of 11 questions, rate of correct answers will be recorded (e.g. 8/10 correct answers) and higher scores mean a better outcome. | Immediately after completing the evaluation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time consumed | Analyse the time spent for the evaluation of the cases and complete the questionnaire Assessed by total time needed to make decision for 15 patient cases in minutes | Immediately after completing the evaluation |
| NASA Task Load Index |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roberto I Troisi, MD PhD FEBS | Federico II University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico II University | Naples | 80131 | Italy |
All collected IPD are to be shared
Starting 6 months after publication
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Other | Clinical decision making based on visualisation of 3D liver rendering on computer monitors on a PDF file |
|
Analyse the NASA TLI score for each participant to evaluate the cases by conducting a subjective mental workload assessment rating performance across six dimensions to determine an overall workload rating:
Each participant gives a rating for each subscale from 1 (low) to 20 (high) and the TLX will calculate the overall worklaod score between 0 and 100
| Immediately after completing the evaluation |