Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of a foam roller warm-up on sports performance in professional basketball players.
Twenty-two professional basketball players, divided into two randomized groups, carried out a specific warm-up for three months with a foam roller. Three measurements were made, pre-intervention, post-intervention at 12 weeks and a four-week follow-up. In these measurements reference data were taken for jumping, ankle dorsiflexion and balance. During this protocol, they performed three series of sixty seconds of application with thirty seconds of rest between series, three days a week and applied to the calf muscles, hamstrings, quadriceps, gluteus and TFL.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warm-up + Foam Roller | Experimental | General Warm-up + Warm-up with Foam Roller |
|
| Warm-up Only | No Intervention | General Warm-up only |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foam Roller | Device | General Warm-up + Foam Roller |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Know the effectiveness of a warm-up with a foam roller in proffesional basketball player during 18 weeks on jumping using the Counter Movement Jump, dorsiflexión using the Lung Test and the balance using the Y-Balance Test | The countermovement jump will obtain the jump height in centimetres, the ankle dorsiflexion in degrees using the Lung test and the distance in centimeters using the Y-Balance test. High scores in any of the tests will lead to a decrease in the risk of injury and an improvement in performance. A first pre-intervention measurement is carried out, another at 14 weeks post-intervention and others at 18 weeks follow-up. This is the general measure. | Baseline and week 18 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the improvement obtained in the experimental group after a warm-up protocol with foam roller for 14weeks 3 days per week on the Counter Movement Jump, Lung Test and Y-Balance test vs non-intervention group. | Observe the differences obtained after 14 weeks between the pre-intervention vs post-intervention measurement in the experimental group and in the control group. This is the specific measure. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Casado | Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia | Murcia | Murica | 30107 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39758693 | Derived | Casado D, Nacher I, Pardo J, Reina J. Effectiveness of a Foam Roller Warm-Up in Professional Basketball Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Jan 1;20(1):15-29. doi: 10.26603/001c.127266. eCollection 2025. |
Not provided
Not provided
No research data from the participants is currently shared, the results will be published by the researchers of this study in academic journals. In the future, it is not ruled out making our data and results available to interested researchers and possible collaborators who contact specifically the researchers of our study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001265 | Athletic Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomiced Controlled Trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline and week 14 |
| Maintenance of foam roller warm-up adaptations on the Counter Movement Jump, Lung Test and Y-Balance Test after intervention for a 1 month | To observe if the differences obtained after 14 weeks of intervention are maintained or not during the following 4 weeks of follow-up, between the post-intervention vs. post-follow-up measurement in the experimental group and in the control group. This is a specific measure | Week 14 and week 18 |