FES VS Constrained Induced MT Recovery and Spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Ischemic Patients

Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Constrained Induced Movement Therapy for Motor Recovery and Spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients

To determines the effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation versus Constrained Induced Movement Therapy for motor recovery and spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinically diagnosed chronic ischemic stroke patients. Patients from both genders Age 45 year and older. Patients having upper limb spasticity equal to 2 or less than 2 according to modified ash worth scale.

Patients having active cognitive scoring on Mini Mental State Examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

Having pacemaker and other stimulation devices. Prosthesis of bones, joints in targeted region of treatment. Patients presenting the history of recurrent stroke. Patients having history of bilateral hemiparesis. Co-morbid history of tumor, heart disease, hypertensive. Patients presenting with skin lesions, wounds, discoloration will be excluded from this research.