Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01HD049777 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) | NIH |
| Case Western Reserve University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Stroke is the leading cause of activity limitation among older adults in the United States. NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) can assist stroke survivors in regaining motor ability and decreasing activity limitation caused by stroke. This study will research the effects of two types of NMES on reducing motor impairment and activity limitation.
Stroke is the leading cause of activity limitation among older adults in the United States. NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) can be used by stroke survivors who do not have enough residual movement to take part in volitional active repetitive movement therapy and does not require expensive equipment or skilled personnel. Two types of NMES are available. The first is cyclic NMES, which electrically activates paretic muscles at a set duty cycle for a preset time period. (This study will employ both "traditional" cyclic stimulation and "sensory-only" stimulation, in which intensity is set at a level to be felt by the patient but insufficient to cause muscle contraction.)In cyclic NMES, the patient is a passive participant and does not assist the NMES by volitionally contracting the muscle during stimulation. The second type encompasses various forms of NMES in combination with biofeedback. For example, in "EMG-triggered" NMES, subjects are "rewarded" with stimulation in response to successful attempts to reach a pre-set level of EMG activity in the affected muscle. There is increased cognitive input and involvement on the part of the patient. The purpose of this study is to first demonstrate the effectiveness of these two types of surface stimulation on decreasing motor impairment and activity limitation; the study also seeks to assess the effect of adding cognitive input to NMES to reduce motor impairment and activity limitation.
Study subjects will be acute stroke survivors. They will participate for a total of eight months, beginning within the first six months after their stroke. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups and will receive stimulation accordingly: 1) Cyclic stimulation; 2)Sensory-only stimulation; and 3)EMG-triggered stimulation. Members of each treatment group will be given an appropriate NMES device to use for two 40-minute treatment sessions per day, five times per week for eight weeks; for a total of 80 treatment sessions. Stimulation will be applied to ECR and EDC (wrist and finger extensors) on the affected arm. A treatment therapist will visit the patient at home on a weekly basis to monitor subject compliance and to provide feedback on device usage. The primary outcome measure will be the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA), a measure of motor impairment. The modified Arm Motor Ability Test (mAMAT) is a hemiparetic arm-specific measure of activity limitation, and will serve as a secondary outcome measure.
In addition to the baseline visit on day of enrollment, subjects will complete these outcome measurements at the clinic on five other occasions: at mid-treatment (week 5); end of treatment (week 9); and for follow-up visits at one-, three- and six-months post-treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Cyclic stim | Active Comparator |
|
|
| B. Sensory stim | Active Comparator | Sensory-only electrical stimulation. The stimulation will be cyclic in nature but intensity will be set to a level that can be felt by the patient but not sufficient to cause muscle contraction. Uses NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities |
|
| C. EMG-Triggered | Active Comparator | EMG-Triggered electrical stimulation. Subjects in this group will attempt to extend their affected wrist and fingers in response to an audio cue. They will be "rewarded" with stimulation to cause full hand opening once they have generated EMG sufficient to reach a preset threshold level. Uses NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities | Device | All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Motor Impairment Measure | The FMA battery measures six dimensions of post-stroke impairment including upper and lower limb motor impairment, range of motion, pain, reflexes, and sensation. , "Each item (33 total) is graded on a 3-point ordinal scale (0, cannot perform; 1, perform partially; and 2, perform fully) and summed to provide a score ranging from 0 to 66, where higher scores indicate better motor function The FMA was administered with the participant seated. | FMA will be administered on 6 occasions: at baseline, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and follow-up at 1-,3- and 6-months post-treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) - Hemiparetic Arm-specific Measure of Activity Limitation | The AMAT assesses upper limb specific tasks and does not allow for compensation. The AMAT consists of 13 compound ADL tasks composed of 1 to 3 component tasks, with a total of 28 component tasks. Each task was rated on the functional ability ordinal scale from 0-5 and an average is calculated, so the final score remains 0-5, with higher scores indicating lesser activity limitation. Total range of reported data is between 0 and 5 because the average is reported. 0 refers to no function. 5 refers to normal function. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John Chae, MD | MetroHealth Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwin Shaw Rehab - Akron General Medical Center | Akron | Ohio | 44312 | United States | ||
| University of Cincinnati College of Medicine |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8831470 | Background | Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers TC. Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jun;77(6):549-53. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90293-2. | |
| 9596245 | Background | Chae J, Bethoux F, Bohine T, Dobos L, Davis T, Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke. 1998 May;29(5):975-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.5.975. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Cleveland FES Center | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | A. Cyclic Stim |
NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| FG001 | C. EMG-Triggered | EMG-Triggered electrical stimulation. Subjects in this group will attempt to extend their affected wrist and fingers in response to an audio cue. They will be "rewarded" with stimulation to cause full hand opening once they have generated EMG sufficient to reach a preset threshold level. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| FG002 | B. Sensory Stim | Sensory-only electrical stimulation. The stimulation will be cyclic in nature but intensity will be set to a level that can be felt by the patient but not sufficient to cause muscle contraction. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Non-hospitalized adults within 6 months of stroke aged 21-89 years.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | A. Cyclic Stim |
NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Motor Impairment Measure | The FMA battery measures six dimensions of post-stroke impairment including upper and lower limb motor impairment, range of motion, pain, reflexes, and sensation. , "Each item (33 total) is graded on a 3-point ordinal scale (0, cannot perform; 1, perform partially; and 2, perform fully) and summed to provide a score ranging from 0 to 66, where higher scores indicate better motor function The FMA was administered with the participant seated. | All cases, intent-to-treat, adjusted for site | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | FMA will be administered on 6 occasions: at baseline, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and follow-up at 1-,3- and 6-months post-treatment. |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | A. Cyclic Stim |
NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illness, +/- hospitalization | General disorders | Adverse Events | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shock | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Adverse Events | Non-systematic Assessment | Subjects received non-injurious electrical stimulus while moving electrode pads when stimulator was in operation |
the estimated sample size needed to reach 90% power to detect clinically meaningful differences within the groups was not met due to slow recruitment. The lower power creates the possibility that a type II error was made.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard WIlson, MD | MetroHealth Medical Center | 216-957-3559 | rwilson@metrohealth.org |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D010291 | Paresis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| AMAT will be administered on 6 occasions as above: at baseline, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and follow-up at 1-,3- and 6-months post-treatment. |
| Cincinnati |
| Ohio |
| 45267 |
| United States |
| MetroHealth Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44109 | United States |
| 10390311 | Background | Powell J, Pandyan AD, Granat M, Cameron M, Stott DJ. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke. 1999 Jul;30(7):1384-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.7.1384. |
| 9596400 | Background | Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Lewis G, Pang S. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 May;79(5):570-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90074-0. |
| 10835457 | Background | Cauraugh J, Light K, Kim S, Thigpen M, Behrman A. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1360-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1360. |
| 12052996 | Background | Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke. 2002 Jun;33(6):1589-94. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000016926.77114.a6. |
| 9606771 | Background | Sonde L, Gip C, Fernaeus SE, Nilsson CG, Viitanen M. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998 Jun;30(2):95-9. doi: 10.1080/003655098444192. |
| 10688340 | Background | Sonde L, Kalimo H, Fernaeus SE, Viitanen M. Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Feb;14(1):14-9. doi: 10.1191/026921500673534278. |
| 508075 | Background | Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Nov;60(11):497-502. |
| 1543423 | Background | Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Mar;73(3):220-7. |
| 14618287 | Background | Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey LL, Lojovich JM, Carey JR. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(4):450-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1695-y. Epub 2003 Nov 15. |
| 27225977 | Derived | Wilson RD, Page SJ, Delahanty M, Knutson JS, Gunzler DD, Sheffler LR, Chae J. Upper-Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing EMG-Triggered, Cyclic, and Sensory Electrical Stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Nov;30(10):978-987. doi: 10.1177/1545968316650278. Epub 2016 May 24. |
| Neuromotor Recovery \& Rehabilitation Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio | View source |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| No category |
|
| BG001 | C. EMG-Triggered | EMG-Triggered electrical stimulation. Subjects in this group will attempt to extend their affected wrist and fingers in response to an audio cue. They will be "rewarded" with stimulation to cause full hand opening once they have generated EMG sufficient to reach a preset threshold level. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| BG002 | B. Sensory Stim | Sensory-only electrical stimulation. The stimulation will be cyclic in nature but intensity will be set to a level that can be felt by the patient but not sufficient to cause muscle contraction. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Months from Stroke | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | months |
|
| OG001 | C. EMG-Triggered | EMG-Triggered electrical stimulation. Subjects in this group will attempt to extend their affected wrist and fingers in response to an audio cue. They will be "rewarded" with stimulation to cause full hand opening once they have generated EMG sufficient to reach a preset threshold level. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
| OG002 | B. Sensory Stim | Sensory-only electrical stimulation. The stimulation will be cyclic in nature but intensity will be set to a level that can be felt by the patient but not sufficient to cause muscle contraction. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) - Hemiparetic Arm-specific Measure of Activity Limitation | The AMAT assesses upper limb specific tasks and does not allow for compensation. The AMAT consists of 13 compound ADL tasks composed of 1 to 3 component tasks, with a total of 28 component tasks. Each task was rated on the functional ability ordinal scale from 0-5 and an average is calculated, so the final score remains 0-5, with higher scores indicating lesser activity limitation. Total range of reported data is between 0 and 5 because the average is reported. 0 refers to no function. 5 refers to normal function. | All cases, intent to treat | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | AMAT will be administered on 6 occasions as above: at baseline, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and follow-up at 1-,3- and 6-months post-treatment. |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
| 39 |
| 1 |
| 39 |
| EG001 | C. EMG-Triggered | EMG-Triggered electrical stimulation. Subjects in this group will attempt to extend their affected wrist and fingers in response to an audio cue. They will be "rewarded" with stimulation to cause full hand opening once they have generated EMG sufficient to reach a preset threshold level. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. | 13 | 41 | 3 | 41 |
| EG002 | B. Sensory Stim | Sensory-only electrical stimulation. The stimulation will be cyclic in nature but intensity will be set to a level that can be felt by the patient but not sufficient to cause muscle contraction. NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities: All groups will use the NeuroMove NM900 stimulator. Subjects will use the stimulator as described for their group (treatment arm) for two 40-minute sessions per day, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Surface electrodes for all three groups will be placed over the affected EDC and ECR (finger and wrist extensor) muscles. | 9 | 42 | 2 | 42 |
| Fall | General disorders | Adverse Events | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Surgery or procedure | Investigations | Adverse Events | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | Adverse Event | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | General disorders | Adverse Event | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
|
| Muscle Twitch | Nervous system disorders | Adverse Events | Non-systematic Assessment | Subject experienced muscle twitching other than expected |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
|
| End of Treatment |
|
| 1 month after treatment |
|
| 3 months after treatment |
|
| 6 months after treatment |
|
| Mixed Models Analysis |
A random intercept for each participant with a first-order antedependent covariance structure. Adjusted for site. |
| <0.001 |
time effect, F(1,109)=91.1, p<0.001 |
| Superiority |