A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve- Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve- Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether the 2-year probability of major adverse cardiac events (primary composite outcome) differed significantly between patients who underwent angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(PCI) and those who underwent Fractional Flow Reserve(FFR)-guided PCI in patients with Left Main Coronary Artery disease(LMCA).
All participants will be monitored over a span of two years and the time point of the year of last subject last visit. The term "year of last subject last visit" refers to the time point of the last visit for all participants. At this specific time point, event occurrence check will be conducted to determine the occurrence of endpoint events among all participants.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1) Participated in the observational study expected no effect on the safety and/or effectiveness evaluation of this trial.
2) Screening failed before any interventional factor is involved.
3) Participated in academic trials like strategic comparison studies conducted under standard therapy provided that there is no additional risk or a specific procedure to a subject and no interference between this trial and other studies.
dwpark@amc.seoul.kr
Hong Kong, Hong Kong