Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this multicenter, international study we are evaluating two approaches to determine which coronary artery narrowings require stent placement in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Patients will be randomized to an angiographic strategy, where only coronary angiography is used to determine which lesions to stent or to a pressure wire strategy where fractional flow reserve, an index measured with the pressure wire, will be used to determine which lesions to stent. The primary outcome will be major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. A secondary outcome will be cost-effectiveness.
Detailed protocol
Follow-up
All patients will be followed up after 1 month (±1 week), 6 months (±1 month), and 1 year (±1 month). All adverse cardiac events (death, acute MI, CABG or [re]-PCI will be noted, as well as functional class and number of anti-anginal drugs. If a patient is admitted to a hospital because of an acute coronary syndrome, repeat angiography is strongly advocated to define if the event is related to one of the deferred lesions or to one of the non-deferred lesions. If the patient belongs to the FFR-guided arm, repeat measurement of FFR is advocated for all lesions. If, during follow-up, patients in the FFR-guided group have to undergo coronary angiography because of recurrent angina or any other reason without an event, pressure measurement should be repeated as well.
On the contrary, once a patient has been assigned to the angiographic guided group, this strategy should be followed consistently during follow-up investigations. For example, if a patient in the angiographic guided arm has recurrent chest pain, undergoes angiography, and is found to have in-stent restenosis, re-PCI should be performed based on the angiogram and pressure wire use is prohibited.
In other words, the strategy to which the patient has been assigned initially, should be followed during the entire study period.
Endpoints
Primary endpoints
1. The primary clinical endpoint is the 12-month binary major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate. MACE is defined as:
Secondary endpoints
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FFR guided PCI | Experimental |
| |
| Angio-guided PCI | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fractional flow reserve | Device |
| ||
| Angio-guided PCI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major Adverse Cardiac Events | All cause death, Documented myocardial infarction, Repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) as adjudicated by the Clinical Event Committee | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Effectiveness Measured as Index Procedural and Hospitalization Costs | Costs for each strategy included the initial procedural costs and costs during the 1-year follow-up. The costs of the index procedures were calculated from the actual resource consumption by determining the amount of guiding catheters, regular wires, pressure wires, balloon dilatation catheters, stents, antiplatelet therapy, adenosine, contrast media, and hospital days used for each patient's index procedure. These were multiplied by the cost of each resource in US dollars. All costs were converted to 2008 US dollars using the consumer price index (www.bls.gov). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:- at least 2 coronary lesions of 50% stenosis or greater in at least 2 major epicardial arteries
Exclusion Criteria:-- STEMI < 5 days ago or non-STEMI with CK > 1000 U/l < 5 days ago
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nico H Pijls | Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven | Principal Investigator |
| William F Fearon | Stanford University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford University School of Medicine | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States | ||
| Catharina Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21126973 | Result | Fearon WF, Bornschein B, Tonino PA, Gothe RM, Bruyne BD, Pijls NH, Siebert U; Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) Study Investigators. Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2010 Dec 14;122(24):2545-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.925396. Epub 2010 Nov 29. | |
| 19144937 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | FFR Guided PCI | Fractional flow reserve |
| FG001 | Angio-guided PCI | Angio-guided PCI |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | FFR Guided PCI | Fractional flow reserve |
| BG001 | Angio-guided PCI | Angio-guided PCI |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Major Adverse Cardiac Events | All cause death, Documented myocardial infarction, Repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) as adjudicated by the Clinical Event Committee | Posted | Number | participants | 1 year |
|
|
1 year
Per protocol, major cardiac events were collected as adverse events.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | FFR Guided PCI | Fractional flow reserve |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William F. Fearon, MD | Stanford University | 650 725-2621 | wfearon@stanford.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 1 year |
| Eindhoven |
| Netherlands |
| Result |
| Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. |
| 30354650 | Derived | Nishi T, Piroth Z, De Bruyne B, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Kobayashi Y, Derimay F, Fournier S, Barbato E, Tonino P, Juni P, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF. Fractional Flow Reserve and Quality-of-Life Improvement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1797-1804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035263. |
| 27056776 | Derived | Kobayashi Y, Nam CW, Tonino PA, Kimura T, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. The Prognostic Value of Residual Coronary Stenoses After Functionally Complete Revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 12;67(14):1701-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.056. |
| 26333474 | Derived | van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Baumbach A, Engstrom T, Klauss V, MacCarthy PA, Manoharan G, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, Van't Veer M, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1853-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4. Epub 2015 Aug 30. |
| 21903052 | Derived | Nam CW, Mangiacapra F, Entjes R, Chung IS, Sels JW, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 13;58(12):1211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.020. |
| 20537493 | Derived | Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, De Bruyne B; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28. |
| BG002 |
| Total |
Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cost Effectiveness Measured as Index Procedural and Hospitalization Costs | Costs for each strategy included the initial procedural costs and costs during the 1-year follow-up. The costs of the index procedures were calculated from the actual resource consumption by determining the amount of guiding catheters, regular wires, pressure wires, balloon dilatation catheters, stents, antiplatelet therapy, adenosine, contrast media, and hospital days used for each patient's index procedure. These were multiplied by the cost of each resource in US dollars. All costs were converted to 2008 US dollars using the consumer price index (www.bls.gov). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | US dollars | 1 year |
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
| 509 |
| 0 |
| 509 |
| EG001 | Angio-guided PCI | Angio-guided PCI | 91 | 496 | 0 | 496 |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Repeat vascularization | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D001161 |
| Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |