Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a severe mood disorder affecting between 1% and 3% of the general population. It is characterized by the succession of depressive and manic episodes, with periods of stabilization during which patients may present "residual" depressive or anxious symptoms, which are characterized by sadness and emotional hyper-reactivity. Although subthreshold, these residual symptoms are very disabling for their daily lives and are associated with the risk of recurrence and poor global functioning. The effect of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments is demonstrated in the management of acute episodes but remains insufficient on residual symptoms. Therefore, there are so far few therapeutic options to target the inter-episode residual symptoms in BD. One novel approach is the real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback (NFB), which has already been shown to be an efficient method for self-regulating brain function, behavior and treating depression.
Hypothesis/Objective :
This study aims at assessing the efficacy of 3-weeks neurofeedback training with real-time fMRI on the treatment of residual mood symptoms in patients with BD. The investigators will specifically target depressive symptoms by training the patients to regulate the emotional network hemodynamic response to emotional stimuli.
Method :
The investigators will include 64 stabilized patients with BD. The investigators will recruit them in three French expert centers for BD and will randomly assign them to the experimental group, receiving feedback from the emotional brain network hemodynamic activity, or to the control group, receiving the signal from control brain areas not involved in emotion processing. Both groups will be trained to regulate their brain activity while they are presented with negatively valenced emotional pictures, based on the neurofeedback shown immediately after the trial. They will continue their usual treatment (as prescribed) throughout the duration of the study. Clinical scales and cognitive tests will enable us to evaluate the symptomatic, emotional, and cognitive changes after NFB training. The investigators will also measure resting-state functional connectivity and brain morphology before and after NFB to assess brain plasticity and to explore the neural mechanisms associated with successful regulation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active feedback | Experimental | Group receiving "real" neurofeedback (NFB) (activity of the emotional brain network) |
|
| Sham feedback | Sham Comparator | Group receiving "sham" NFB (activity from brain regions not implicated in emotion processing) to control for a potential placebo effect. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback | Other | Neurofeedback with real-time fMRI is a recent technique that allows to record the BOLD signal from a particular brain region and to display it back in real-time to the participant. With this feedback on brain activity, subjects can learn to control the activity of selected brain areas. Trial after trial, participants develop their individual strategies to voluntarily regulate the signal. The main objective of the neurofeedback training is that the participant develops an enhanced ability to exert control over activity in the target area(s) even without feedback. By manipulating targeted brain circuits, this training can induce modifications in particular behaviors and promote selective plasticity within the corresponding brain networks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score | Evaluation of depressive symptoms. Total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms. | Baseline, 3 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | Evaluation of depressive symptoms. Total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josselin HOUENOU, Professor (MD, PhD) | Contact | (+33)1 49 81 30 51 | josselin.houenou@aphp.fr | |
| Pauline Favre, Associate researcher (PhD) | Contact | (+33)1 69 08 24 81 | pauline.favre@cea.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Chenevier | Recruiting | Créteil | val-de-marne | 94000 | France |
DATAS ARE OWN BY ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE - HOPITAUX DE PARIS, PLEASE CONTACT SPONSOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Evaluation of manic symptoms. Total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms. |
| Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS) | Evaluation of bipolar depression. Total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI A-B) | Evaluation of trait and state anxiety. Total score ranging from 20 to 80 for both subscales, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Multidimensional Assessment of Thymic States - MAThyS | Evaluation of thymic state. Total score ranging from 0 to 200, lower scores indicate general inhibition, and higher scores indicate general excitation. A more descriptive approach can be done by analysing the sub-score. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Affective Intensity Measure - AIM | Evaluation of emotion reactivity. Total score ranging from 20 to 120, with higher scores indicating higher strength or intensity of people's emotional experiences. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Affective Lability Scale - ALS | Evaluation of mood lability. Total score ranging from 0 to 162, with higher scores indicating greater affective lability. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire - CERQ | Evaluation of emotion regulation abilities. Subscales scores ranging from 4 to 20, with higher subscale scores indicating greater use of a specific cognitive strategy. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Quality of life scale - QOLS | Quality of life assessment. Score ranging from 1 to 5, 5 indicating better quality of life | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. . |
| Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire - FFMQ | Evaluation of trait mindfulness. Total score ranging from 39 to 195, higher scores are indicative of someone who is more mindful in their everyday life | Baseline, 3 weeks and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Global functioning assessment - GAF scale | Evaluation of global functioning. Total score ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating better global functioning. | Baseline, 3 weeks, and 4, 8 weeks after the end of the training. |
| Questionnaire of Adherence to the technology | Evaluation of the score of the acceptability of neurofeedback. Total score ranging from 6 to 42, higher scores indicating better acceptability of the technology. | Baseline, 3 weeks. |
| Self-efficacy scale | Evaluation of personal efficiency. Total score ranging from 21 to 105, higher scores indicating stronger belief that one's actions are responsible for successful outcomes. | Baseline, 3 weeks. |
| The Ekman facial recognition test | Emotion recognition evaluation. Cognitive task | Baseline, 3 weeks. |
| The affective bias task | Evaluation of emotional bias. Cognitive task | Baseline, 3 weeks. |
| The Test battery for Attentional Performance (TAP) | Evaluation of attention. Cognitive task | Baseline, 3 weeks. |
| The choice reaction task | Evaluation of mindwandering, meta-awareness and ruminations. Cognitive task | Baseline, 3 weeks. |
| MRI T1-T2 weighted scan | Evaluation of grey and white matter (micro)structure. MRI measurement | Baseline, 3 weeks |
| MRI diffusion weighted scan | Evaluation of grey and white matter (micro)structure. MRI measurement | Baseline, 3 weeks |
| functional MRI resting-state scan | Evaluation of brain functional connectivity. MRI measurement | Baseline, 3 weeks |