Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnosis of Endobronchial US-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Moderate Sedation by Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to compare dexmedetomidine as moderate sedation versus general anathesia on the diagnostic yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as a highly effective, minimally invasive technique for sampling peribronchial, mediastinal, and lung masses for pathologic examination with low rate of complications, and costs.

Dexmedetomidine, is a high-affinity adrenergic agonist of the alpha 2 receptor, is a potential alternative sedative.

The use of dexmedetomidine does not lead to respiratory depression, or to a decline in cognitive skills or patient cooperation. This is because dexmedetomidine acts on the alpha-2 receptors in the locus coeruleus, in contrast to other sedatives (midazolam and propofol) which act on GABA receptors/cerebral cortex.

Inclusion Criteria:

• American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification II or III a requiring EBUS-TBNA based on suspicion of either benign or malignant disease in mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes (LNs) or masses or requiring EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging of lung cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Suspected need for additional procedures other than EBUS-TBNA during planned bronchoscopy (e.g., need for navigational bronchoscopy, endobronchial biopsies, and therapeutic bronchoscopy)
• body mass index > 35 kg/m2
• allergies to any of the involved sedatives or anesthetic agents
• comorbidities contraindicating the EBUS procedure
• pregnancy