Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect of spinal mobilization techniques applied in addition to core stabilization exercises in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients.
Consecutive adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, aged 10 to 16 years, without a brace, and with a Cobb curvature of 10 to 25 degrees were randomly divided into two groups using the closed envelope method: Spinal mobilization and core stabilization exercise were applied to the experimental group; Only core stabilization exercises were applied to the control group.
Both groups received interventions twice a week for 10 weeks. Outcome measurements were made before treatment and after 10 weeks of treatment.
This study was a randomized controlled trial in which participants and assessor were blinded. This study was carried out in Amasya University Ruhi Tingiz Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital Rehabilitation Unit between August 2022 and January 2023. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Amasya University (E-76988455-050.01.04-83314) on 05.08.2022 to conduct the study. Before the study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with the all participants and parents and informed about the subject and purpose of the study. Verbal and written consent was obtained from the all participants and parents.
Sample size: The sample of the study was calculated with the G*Power 3.1 program, and the effect size (d=1.0) was calculated according to the double-tailed hypothesis method, taking into account the study. (d=1.0; α=0.05; 1-ß=0.80). Confidence interval was determined as 80% and margin of error was 5% (α=0.05). As a result of the calculation, it was determined that there should be 17 adolescent scoliosis patients for the control group, 17 for the experimental group, and a total of 34 adolescent scoliosis patients. Considering the possible data losses of the participants, we planned to include a total of 40 participants, 20 in both groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal mobilization group | Experimental |
| |
| Core stabilization exercise group | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal mobilization | Other | Spinal mobilization and core stabilization exercise |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cobb angle | The most accepted way of scoliosis evaluation is Cobb angle measurement performed on frontal plane x-ray. The Cobb angle is the curvature of the spine, and measuring it is essential for determining the severity of scoliosis, selecting the best course of action, and monitoring the progression or regression of cases following treatment. The Cobb angle measure as the vertically intersecting angle after determining the vertebrae above the apex and below the apex, which are the most tilted from the concave side of the curvature of the spine. | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Angle of Trunk Rotation | It assessed with a Bunnell scoliometer is a type of inclinometer that measures the asymmetry of the degree of axial rotation on both sides of the body. Assessment is in a standing, forward-bending position bent-over position (arms dangling, palms pressed together) with the pelvis horizontal, and subject standing on a foot template | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hacettepe University | Ankara | 06000 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Core stabilization exercise | Other | Stabilization exercises for the spine |
|
| Pulmonary Functions Test- PEF (Peak expiratory flow) | Peak expiratory flow (PEF) is the volume of air forcefully expelled from the lungs in one quick exhalation, and is a reliable indicator of ventilation adequacy as well as airflow obstruction. | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |
| Pulmonary Functions Test- FEV1 (Forced expiratory volume in the first second) | The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the volume of air (in liters) exhaled in the first second during forced exhalation after maximal inspiration | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |
| Pulmonary Functions Test-FVC (Forced vital capacity) | Forced vital capacity, the maximum amount of air you can forcibly exhale from your lungs after fully inhaling. | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |
| Pulmonary Functions Test- FEV1/FVC | The FEV1/FVC ratio is the ratio of the forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs. | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |
| Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale | It was designed to measure physical deformity as perceived by patients with idiopathic scoliosis. The scale assesses seven aspects of the deformity: spinal curvature, rib prominence, flank prominence, deformity/alignment of the thorax with respect to the pelvis, trunk imbalance, shoulder asymmetry and scapular asymmetry. Scores for each catagory range from 1 (no deformity) to 5 (the worst deformity), and the total score is generated from the sum of the scores from the seven domains. | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |
| Scoliosis Research Society-22 | Scale is a simple and practical quality of life questionnaire specially created for individuals with scoliosis. SRS includes parameters such as pain, self-image/appearance, function/activity, mental health, and satisfaction with treatment. It is also stated that it is effective in evaluating the changes that occur with treatment. The questionnaire has a total of 22 items that are scored from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item. | Change from pretreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. |