Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Comprehensive Health Research Center | OTHER |
| Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objectives of the present research is to observe the effects of a multimodal program with augmented reality on cognition, functional fitness, quality of life, and physical activity in older people.
The present investigation lasted 16 weeks. The first two weeks were for familiarization with the tests and initial assessments. This was followed by the 12-week intervention and final assessments (2 weeks).
The intervention program ran for 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week of 60 minutes each. There were three different groups: a) a control group; b) a multimodal training group that combined physical training with cognitive training; c) a multimodal training group with augmented reality.
The control group continued their daily activities for 12 weeks and did not participate in any new physical activity program during the study. In the multimodal training group, the session consisted of four stations where participants simultaneously trained physical aspects (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance, and flexibility) and cognitive aspects (reaction time, memory, decision making, semantics, and processing speed). In the multimodal training session with augmented reality, the session consisted of 6 stations, 4 stations as in the previous group and 2 stations with augmented reality. These 2 stations used the same components but through the portable exergame platform for the elderly.
During the 12 weeks, the intensity and difficulty of each exercise was increased after each session, depending on the evolution of the participants.
When forming the training groups, the participants who were not available during the intervention phase were assigned to the control group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Other | The control group continued their daily activities for 12 weeks and did not participate in any new physical activity program during the study. |
|
| Multimodal training group | Experimental | The session consisted of four stations where participants simultaneously trained physical aspects (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance, and flexibility) and cognitive aspects (reaction time, memory, decision making, semantics, and processing speed). |
|
| Multimodal training group with augmented reality | Experimental | The session consisted of six stations where participants simultaneously trained physical aspects (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance, and flexibility) and cognitive aspects (reaction time, memory, decision making, semantics, and processing speed). Four stations are the same of the previous group and the other 2 stations are with augmented reality. These 2 stations worked the same cognitive and physical components but through the portable exergame platform for the elderly. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal exercise with augmented reality | Other | The intervention program has a duration of 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week of 60 minutes each. The multimodal group with augmented reality was divided into 4 sub-groups. The session consisted of six stations where participants simultaneously trained physical aspects (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance, and flexibility) and cognitive aspects (reaction time, memory, decision making, semantics, and processing speed). Four stations are the same of the previous group and the other 2 stations are with augmented reality. These 2 stations worked the same cognitive and physical components but through the portable exergame platform for the elderly. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) | Evaluates the cognitive state of the participant. The MMSE consists of 6 different domains: orientation, retention, attention and calculation; recall; language, and constructive skills. The maximum score for this test is 30 points. However, the education of the participant education is also taken into account when assigning the score.The scores for determining whether a person has cognitive impairment through the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) are: cut-offs of ≤27 points or persons with >11 years of school education, ≤22 for persons ranging from 1 to 11 years of school education and ≤ 15 points for illiterate persons. | 13 weeks |
| Frontal assessment battery (FAB) | Evaluates executive functions, consisting of 6 tests that explore abilities that are related to the frontal lobes. At FAB, the highest score is 18, indicating the best possible performance on the test. The FAB is divided into 6 domains: Conceptualization, Mental Flexibility, Programming, Sensitivity to Interference, Inhibitory Control, and Environmental Autonomy. In each of the subdomains, the score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 3 (best performance). The subdomains are assessed by short tasks given to the participants. | 13 weeks |
| Deary - Liewald reaction time task | Simple and choice reaction time | 13 weeks |
| Trail Making Test | Cognitive flexibility and processing speed | 13 weeks |
| Phonemic and semantic verbal fluency test. | The test assesses language production, non-motor processing speed, and executive functions. In the semantic fluency task, participants had to say as many animals as possible over 60seconds. In the phonemic fluency exercise, participants were asked to list as many words starting with a specific letter as possible. The duration of the exercise was 60seconds. More words correspond to better scores. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Physical activity | Physical activity was measured using accelerometry. Participants wore the accelerometer on their waist for 7 days. Sedentary time, light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity were recorded. At the end, the results reflected the number of minutes per day/week. | 13 weeks |
| Senior Fitness Test - Rikli and Jones |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soraia Daniela Pires Ferreira | Leiria | 2405-030 | Portugal |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D035061 | Control Groups |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015340 | Epidemiologic Research Design |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D012107 | Research Design |
Not provided
Not provided
There are three different groups: a) a control group; b) a multimodal training group that combined physical training with cognitive training; c) a multimodal training group with augmented reality.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Multimodal exercise | Other | The intervention program has a duration of 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week of 60 minutes each. The multimodal group was divided into 2 sub-groups. The session consisted of four stations where participants simultaneously trained physical aspects (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance, and flexibility) and cognitive aspects (reaction time, memory, decision making, semantics, and processing speed). The session consisted of six stations where participants simultaneously trained physical aspects (cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, balance, and flexibility) and cognitive aspects (reaction time, memory, decision making, semantics, and processing speed). |
|
| Control group | Other | The control group continued their daily activities for 12 weeks and did not participate in any new physical activity program during the study. |
|
| 13 weeks |
| Stroop | Inhibition and resistance to interference. The stroop test consists of three different tasks, each lasting 45 seconds. In the first task, the participant had to read the words presented, and the words could be red, green, blue, and green. In the second task, participants had to say what color they were seeing (red, green, blue or green). In the last task, participants were presented with several words (red, green, blue, and green) written in different colors and were asked to list the color of ink for each word. The number of correct answers was recorded, with the number of correct answers giving the better score. For the participant to meet the normative data, they should enumerate more than 40 words/colors. | 13 weeks |
This test battery evaluates: cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, endurance, flexibility, agility and balance. It consists of 6 different tests: 30-second chair stand (lower limb strength), arm curl (upper limb strength), chair sit and reach (lower limb flexibility), back scratch (upper limb flexibility), 6-minute walk (cardiorespiratory fitness), 8-foot up-ang-go (agility). For each of the tests there are normative values depending on age and gender. |
| 13 weeks |
| Body Composition | Body composition analyzer - Tanita. Tanita works with an electrical bioimpedance analysis that allows to determine body water, visceral fat, fat mass, lean mass, weight, body mass index, bone mass and muscle mass. This device generates a report that indicates whether the patient is in the healthy range or not. | 13 weeks |
| EQ-5D | The 5D questionnaire is used to assess quality of life. It consists of 5 dimensions, mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain, and anxiety/depression. For each dimension, there are 5 response options with a score ranging from 1 (no problem at all) to 5 (unable to do anything). | 13 weeks |
| SF-36 | The SF -36 questionnaire is used to assess the participant's health status of participants. It consists of 36 items that assess physical functioning, physical performance, physical pain, emotional functioning, vitality, mental health, social functioning, and general health. The higher the score, the better the participant's health. | 13 weeks |
| Geriatric depression scale | The depression scale developed by Yesavage has been used to screen for depression. This scale assesses cognitive and behavioral aspects usually involved in depression in the elderly. We used the short version of the scale with 15 questions in which the responses are dichotomous. One point is assigned for responses indicating depression. Scores between 0 and 5 mean that there is no depression; between 6 and 10 mean that there is mild depression, and 11 and 15 mean that the person has severe depression. | 13 weeks |
| D008722 | Methods |