Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland | OTHER |
| Medical University of Bialystok | OTHER |
| University of Opole | OTHER |
| Medical University of Gdansk |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In recent years increasing number of mitral bioprosthesis implantation, especially in elderly population, is observed. Bioprosthetic valves are associated with a lower risk of thrombotic and bleeding adverse events compared with mechanical prostheses, but their use is limited due to their durability. After years numerous patients may develop bioprosthesis failure, requiring valve reintervention. Significantly burdened ones are oftentimes disqualified or not referred to surgery redo. An emerging treatment method for these patients is transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation as an alternative to re-operation. This technique is applied with the use of devices previously dedicated to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Recent papers prove that transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a safe and effective procedure when performed in a selected group of high-surgical-risk patients. However, data regarding the Polish population are limited. Therefore, the aim of the study is to create a nationwide registry, collecting data from all Polish centers performing TMVR in order to describe the population of patients developing mitral bioprosthesis failure, evaluate their follow-up after TMVR as well as results of the transcatheter valvular intervention and identify potential limitations of the procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation | Procedure | Transcatheter transfemoral mitral valve-in-valve implantation is an alternative for surgery redo in high-surgical-risk patients with bioprosthetic valve failure. The procedure is performed via femoral vein access. By the transseptal puncture (in the postero-inferior part of the interatrial septum) and balloon septostomy, the bioprosthetic valve is introduced through the degenerative valve into the left ventricle. The valve is expanded in the mitral position during rapid ventricle pacing. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of all-cause mortality | Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 1 year |
| Rate of hospitalization | Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure. Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 1 year |
| Rate of neurological events | All stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA). Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 1 year |
| Rate of myocardial infarction | Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 1 year |
| Rate of valve-related dysfunction | Mean transvalvular gradient ≥5mmHg; ≥mitral regurgitation; ≥mild paravalvular leak; left ventricle outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO)- (acute hemodynamic deterioration associated with imaging evidence of LVOTO; mean LVOT pressure gradient increasement ≥10 mmHg compared to the baseline value). Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of technical success | Absence of procedural mortality; successful access, delivery, and retrieval of the device delivery system; successful deployment and correct positioning of the first intended device; freedom from emergency surgery or reintervention related to the device or access procedure. Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | at 24 hours |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Disqualification from TMVR
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Polish patients with failed surgically implanted mitral bioprosthetic valves, qualified by decision of the Heart Team to TMVR. All patients meeting inclusion criteria will prospectively included in the study. Patients meeting inclusion criteria before the set-up of registry will be included retrospectively.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of Białystok | Recruiting | Bialystok | 15-089 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26170468 | Background | Stone GW, Adams DH, Abraham WT, Kappetein AP, Genereux P, Vranckx P, Mehran R, Kuck KH, Leon MB, Piazza N, Head SJ, Filippatos G, Vahanian AS; Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC). Clinical trial design principles and endpoint definitions for transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement: part 2: endpoint definitions: A consensus document from the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 1;36(29):1878-91. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv333. Epub 2015 Jul 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Medical University of Silesia | OTHER |
| Medical University of Lodz | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Rate of device success | Absence of procedural mortality or stroke; proper placement and positioning of the device; freedom from unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device or access procedure; continued intended safety and performance of the device. Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 30 days, 6 month, 1 year |
| Rate of procedural success | Device success (either optimal or acceptable), and absence of major device or procedure related serious adverse events, including: A. Death B. Stroke C. Life-threatening bleeding (Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium scale) D. Major vascular complications E. Major cardiac structural complications F. Stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis) G. Myocardial infarction or coronary ischaemia requiring PCI or CABG H. Severe hypotension, heart failure, or respiratory failure requiring intravenous pressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for ≥48 h. I. Any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 30 days |
| Rate of patient success | I. Device success; II. Patient returned to the pre-procedural setting; III. No rehospitalizations or reinterventions for the underlying condition; IV. Improvement from baseline in symptoms; improvement by ≥1 functional class in New York Heart Association scale. Nominal values from I to IV, where higher value indicates worse outcome; V. Improvement from baseline in functional status; improvement by ≥50 m in 6-min walk test. Continuous values in meters, where higher value indicates better outcome; VI. Improvement from baseline in quality-of-life; improvement by ≥10 in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Scores are scaled from 0 to 100, where higher value indicates better outcome. Endpoint described as n=x (y%). | 1 year |
| Medical University of Gdańsk | Recruiting | Gdansk | 80-210 | Poland |
|
| Medical University of Silesia | Recruiting | Katowice | 40-055 | Poland |
|
| Medical University of Łódź | Recruiting | Lodz | 90-419 | Poland |
|
| Medical University of Opole | Recruiting | Opole | 45-052 | Poland |
|
| Medical University of Warsaw | Recruiting | Warsaw | 02-091 | Poland |
|
| Institute of Cardiology | Recruiting | Warsaw | 04-628 | Poland |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008944 | Mitral Valve Insufficiency |
| D008946 | Mitral Valve Stenosis |
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided