Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| OnCare Hong Kong | UNKNOWN |
| The University of Hong Kong | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to validate the use of digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (Digi-ACT) in Hong Kong curative cancer patients with depressive and anxiety symptoms. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Intervention group participants will install the Digi-ACT mobile application and undergo a 3-4 week long intervention. They will have to fill out questionnaires at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at three month follow up to measure depression and anxiety symptoms, health-related quality of life, acceptability of the intervention, and other process outcomes related to the intervention itself.
Researchers will compare the outcomes with a group of participants that undergo a 3-4 week long period where they navigate a similar mobile platform that gives bi-daily psychoeducational videos that also fill out the same clinical questionnaires at baseline, post-intervention, and at three month follow up.
Patients with cancer experience increased rates and severity of depression and anxiety symptoms. This could be due to difficulty dealing with the diagnostic process, treatment side effects, limited social opportunities, physical symptoms, and other cancer-related complications. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has proven to be effective in treating these symptoms for cancer patients. Compared to other evidence based therapies, such as second wave cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), ACT has shown to have larger effect sizes and success in treating this population. One possible explanation could be due to the theoretical and practical approaches of ACT over traditional CBT. Traditional CBT aims to identify illogical thought patterns that are biased or distorted and try to change them, while ACT makes no attempt at changing these thought patterns and simply teaches the participant to accept and experience these thoughts, emotions, and sensations. For cancer patients, feelings of depression when faced with their own mortality, are unavoidable and could be invalidating if told they are "illogical" or "distorted". Therefore, ACT may have the advantage here in recognizing the severity of the cancer journey and providing an alternative way that does not try to change their experiences.
Furthermore, Hong Kong has a persisting mental health treatment gap due to insufficient mental health practitioners. Oftentimes, only moderate to severe cases of common mental disorders are addressed, thereby leaving milder cases untreated. A possible solution to such under-treatment is digital Health, which requires no additional practitioners and has shown promising results in past studies.
Therefore, we aim to test the efficacy, acceptability, and feasibility of a digitized version (mobile application) of ACT for cancer patients in Hong Kong.
We aim to answer several key questions with the current randomized controlled trial (RCT):
Research assistants from Hollo will collaborate with Queen Mary Hospital's Oncological unit and Hong Kong Private Clinic: "Oncare" to recruit 50 Cancer patients for the pilot trial within the inclusion criteria. Participants will be screened at baseline for measures of depression and anxiety. Those that score mild or moderate will be invited to participate in the study. Upon providing informed consent, participants will be instructed to download the Hollo Digi-ACT mobile application.
Participants will be randomly allocated to either intervention or active control. Over 4 weeks, participants in the intervention group will be administered the digitized ACT on their mobile device while those in the active control will receive various educational mental health videos over the 4 weeks. After the completion of the intervention, participants will fill out the same clinical indexes and then a final time 3 months later.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digi-ACT Intervention group | Experimental | 22 day long interactive mobile app intervention with daily activities. The intervention will include 5 total modules: psychoeducation on depression/anxiety and the cancer journey; acceptance; cognitive fusion; mindfulness; and committed valued living. There will be different games and reward components for the Through out the course of the intervention, participants will also do video journals to reflect on the different modules and activities they do. |
|
| Psychoeducational Video Control group | Active Comparator | 22 day long mobile app where participants will be given a 15 minute long psychoeducational clip from a publicly available online seminar (from the Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists) on a bi-daily basis. Through out the course of the intervention, participants will also do video journals to reflect on the content of the different video clips. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance and Commitment Therapy | Device | Smartphone app guided and manualized version of acceptance and commitment therapy. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Depressive Symptoms severity as assessed by the 9 item Chinese Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 month follow up | The Chinese PHQ9 is a validated, self-report instrument that assesses depressive symptoms in the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 0 (no signs of depressive symptoms) to 27 (severe depressive symptoms). | baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Changes in Anxiety Symptoms severity as assessed by the Chinese Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 month follow up | The 21 item Chinese (BAI) is a validated, self-report instrument that assesses anxiety symptoms in the past 2 weeks. Possible scores range from 0 (no signs of anxiety symptoms) to 63 (severe anxiety symptoms). | baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Changes in Quality of Life as assessed by the Chinese Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 month follow up | The 27 item Chinese FACT-G is a validated, self-report instrument that assesses health related quality of life in the past week. Possible scores range from 0 (poor quality of life) to 108 (strong quality of life). | baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability, measured by responses to 4 statements regarding expectations of the intervention at baseline and, immediately after treatment, and 3 month follow up. | Acceptability, measured by responses to 4 statements regarding expectations of the intervention at baseline and, post-treatment, and 3 month follow up. The 4 item acceptability measure involve four statements that participants have to rate on a 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Statements presented at baseline are as follows:
The four statements presented at post-treatment and 3 month follow up will be presented in past tense. Minimum score of 4 indicates strong acceptability and the maximum score of 20 indicates lack of acceptability. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Acceptance, as assessed by the Chinese White Bear Thought Suppression Inventory (WBSI) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months follow up | The 15 item Chinese WBSI measures the degree of thought suppression an individual presents. The inverse score from this measure could be interpreted as a measure of acceptance. Possible scores range from 15 (strong acceptance) to 75 (weak acceptance). |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tun Hoi Duncan Lim, MSc | Contact | 97872500 | 852 | duncan.lim@hollo.hk |
| Cameron Van Breda, BS | Contact | 64035861 | 852 | cameron.vanbreda@hollo.hk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wendy Wing-lok Chan, MBBS | LKS Faculty of Medicine, HKU | Principal Investigator |
| Kevin Ka Ming Wong, MBBS | OnCare Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31563072 | Background | Bai Z, Luo S, Zhang L, Wu S, Chi I. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to reduce depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:728-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.040. Epub 2019 Sep 10. | |
| 11605362 | Background | Barnes-Holmes Y, Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, Roche B. Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101-38. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80063-5. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Psychoeducation Active Control | Other | Set of 11 public seminar videos regarding depression and anxiety. Each are 15 minutes long. |
|
| baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Feasibility, measured by proportion of content completed by immediately after treatment | For those in the intervention group, the digi-ACT content will include 5 modules. Therefore, feasibility for the intervention group will be calculated as the proportion of modules completed, with a score of 0 indicating no modules finished and a score of 1 indicating all modules completed. Similarly, for those in the control video group, there will be 11 videos and feasibility will be calculated as the proportion of these 11 videos viewed with the same minimum and maximum scores. | immediately after treatment |
| baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Changes in degree of Mindfulness as assessed by the Chinese Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale (CMAAS) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 month follow up | The 15 item CMAAS is a validated, self-report instrument that assesses mindfulness. Total score is calculated as an average of the 15 items that are rated on a 1-6 likert scale. Therefore, the average minimum score starts at 1 (lower levels of mindfulness) and goes up to a maximum score of 6 (high levels of dispositional mindfulness. | baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Changes in cognitive fusion as assessed by the 9 item Chinese Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-9) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 month follow up | The Chinese CFQ-9 is a validated, self-report instrument that assesses cognitive fusion. Possible scores range from 7 (low levels of cognitive fusion) to 63 (high levels of cognitive fusion) | baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Changes in valued living as assessed by the Chinese Valued Living Questionnaire (VLQ) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 month follow up | The 10 item Chinese (VLQ) is a validated, self-report instrument that assesses the degree of valued living across 10 different domains. The maximum score of 100 indicates strong and alignment with values whereas a score of 0 would indicate weak alignment and weight placed on their 10 values. | baseline, immediately after treatment, 3 month follow up |
| Accuracy in video journal predicted PHQ-9 scores as assessed by an ai based video journal Within the baseline to immediately after treatment. | A novel video journal measuring facial action units, pitch, and speech content will be used to predict a binary output on whether users present with depression or not. Participants, throughout the intervention or control video viewings, will have to shoot 2 minute videos to react and reflect on the contents of the intervention and videos. | Between baseline and immediately after treatment |
| Background | Che, Lu, Chen, Chang. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory. 台灣醫學. 1006; 447-454. |
| 28807701 | Background | Cheung G, Douwes G, Sundram F. Late-Life Suicide in Terminal Cancer: A Rational Act or Underdiagnosed Depression? J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):835-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Aug 12. |
| 31464026 | Background | Cillessen L, Johannsen M, Speckens AEM, Zachariae R. Mindfulness-based interventions for psychological and physical health outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychooncology. 2019 Dec;28(12):2257-2269. doi: 10.1002/pon.5214. Epub 2019 Sep 11. |
| Background | Cotter DD. Psychometric evaluation of the Valued Living Questionnaire: Comparing distressed and normative samples. Western Michigan University. 2011. |
| Background | Deng Y, Li S, Tang, Zhu L, Ryan R, Brown K. Psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS). Mindfulness. 2012; 3(1), 10-14. |
| 28588005 | Background | Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M. Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Jun 6;4(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/mental.7785. |
| 24411117 | Background | Gillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE, Campbell L, Kerr S, Tansey L, Noel P, Ferenbach C, Masley S, Roach L, Lloyd J, May L, Clarke S, Remington B. The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Behav Ther. 2014 Jan;45(1):83-101. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 18. |
| 27176925 | Background | Graham CD, Gouick J, Krahe C, Gillanders D. A systematic review of the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in chronic disease and long-term conditions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Jun;46:46-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 20. |
| Background | Hayes SC. Buddhism and acceptance and commitment therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. 2002; 9(1), 58-66. |
| Background | Hayes SC. Get out of your mind and into your life: The new acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger Publications. 2005. |
| Background | Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 2009. |
| 20030697 | Background | Hinz A, Krauss O, Hauss JP, Hockel M, Kortmann RD, Stolzenburg JU, Schwarz R. Anxiety and depression in cancer patients compared with the general population. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Jul;19(4):522-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01088.x. Epub 2009 Dec 17. |
| 24605197 | Background | Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization). Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;6(1):103-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103. Epub 2014 Feb 14. |
| 32358608 | Background | Kioskli K, Scott W, Winkley K, Godfrey E, McCracken LM. Online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for People with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy in the United Kingdom: A Single-Arm Feasibility Trial. Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):2777-2788. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa110. |
| 33517079 | Background | Li H, Wong CL, Jin X, Chen J, Chong YY, Bai Y. Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on health-related outcomes for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Mar;115:103876. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103876. Epub 2021 Jan 12. |
| 29082858 | Background | Lin J, Paganini S, Sander L, Luking M, Ebert DD, Buhrman M, Andersson G, Baumeister H. An Internet-Based Intervention for Chronic Pain. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Oct 13;114(41):681-688. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0681. |
| Background | Luoma JB, Hayes SC, Walser RD. Learning ACT: An acceptance & commitment therapy skills-training manual for therapists. New Harbinger Publications. 2007. |
| 14998740 | Background | Masuda A, Hayes SC, Sackett CF, Twohig MP. Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: examining the impact of a ninety year old technique. Behav Res Ther. 2004 Apr;42(4):477-85. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.10.008. |
| 33655563 | Background | Men VY, Emery CR, Yip PSF. Characteristics of cancer patients who died by suicide: A quantitative study of 15-year coronial records. Psychooncology. 2021 Jul;30(7):1051-1058. doi: 10.1002/pon.5634. Epub 2021 Mar 2. |
| Background | Menin J, de Blasio B. New York city mobile services study. Research Brief, Department of Consumer Affairs, New York City. 2015. |
| 25193001 | Background | Ost LG. The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Oct;61:105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Aug 19. |
| 29695476 | Background | Pitman A, Suleman S, Hyde N, Hodgkiss A. Depression and anxiety in patients with cancer. BMJ. 2018 Apr 25;361:k1415. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1415. No abstract available. |
| Background | Rodriguez MA, Jia K, Qian MY. White Bear Suppression Inventory: Structure, reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2012. |
| Background | Razzouk R, Shute V. What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of educational research. 2012; 82(3): 330-348. |
| 29481976 | Background | Simister HD, Tkachuk GA, Shay BL, Vincent N, Pear JJ, Skrabek RQ. Randomized Controlled Trial of Online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Fibromyalgia. J Pain. 2018 Jul;19(7):741-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 2. |
| 16400532 | Background | Tatrow K, Montgomery GH. Cognitive behavioral therapy techniques for distress and pain in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2006 Feb;29(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s10865-005-9036-1. Epub 2006 Jan 7. |
| 24923259 | Background | Trompetter HR, Bohlmeijer ET, Veehof MM, Schreurs KM. Internet-based guided self-help intervention for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2015 Feb;38(1):66-80. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9579-0. Epub 2014 Jun 13. |
| 34660209 | Background | van de Graaf DL, Trompetter HR, Smeets T, Mols F. Online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions for chronic pain: A systematic literature review. Internet Interv. 2021 Oct 1;26:100465. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100465. eCollection 2021 Dec. |
| 25023953 | Background | Wang W, Bian Q, Zhao Y, Li X, Wang W, Du J, Zhang G, Zhou Q, Zhao M. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 6. |
| 7861307 | Background | Wegner DM, Zanakos S. Chronic thought suppression. J Pers. 1994 Dec;62(4):616-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x. |
| Background | Wei-Chen Z, Yang J, Li X, Hui-Na G, Zhuo-Hong Z. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2014;28(1): 40-44. |
| 26092476 | Background | Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19. |
| 10738232 | Background | Yu CL, Fielding R, Chan CL, Tse VK, Choi PH, Lau WH, Choy DT, O SK, Lee AW, Sham JS. Measuring quality of life of Chinese cancer patients: A validation of the Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale. Cancer. 2000 Apr 1;88(7):1715-27. |
| 21193179 | Background | Yu X, Tam WW, Wong PT, Lam TH, Stewart SM. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for measuring depressive symptoms among the general population in Hong Kong. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;53(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Dec 28. |
| 33248396 | Background | Zhao C, Lai L, Zhang L, Cai Z, Ren Z, Shi C, Luo W, Yan Y. The effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on the psychological and physical outcomes among cancer patients: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Jan;140:110304. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110304. Epub 2020 Nov 20. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided