Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Protocal changing due to time limitation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Warakorn Charoensuk | UNKNOWN |
| Apiphan Iamchaimongkol | UNKNOWN |
| Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There are 3 phases of the study. This registration is phase 2.1.This registration will conduct a pilot study in the cerebral palsy children.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| video game in CP children (pilot study) | Experimental | The cerebral palsy children will play the engineer-built system, video-game based Kinect sensor 3 times/week for 5 weeks. Each session will last for 40 minutes. The video-game Kinect sensor was developed by the researcher team. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| the engineer-built system, video-game based Kinect sensor | Device | The engineer-built system, video-game based Kinect sensor was developed by the researcher team. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Range of Motion | The range or motion of shoulder, elbow and wrist will be assessed by goniometer. The assessment will be done before starting the intervention as the baseline and then after finishing the intervention to detect change of range of motion from the the baseline. The range of motion will be reported in degrees. | before starting the intervention and after finishing the intervention within 1 week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Box and block test | The name 'box and block test' is an unabbreviated scale title. The minimum score is zero and the maximum score is infinity. | before starting the intervention and after finishing the intervention within 1 week |
| ABILHANDS-Kids |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| patient satisfaction form | The patient satisfaction form is about the questionnaire asking about the satisfaction of playing game in these areas: the presentation of games: the contents of game, the convenience and the outcome after playing game. The participants will rate each question in 5-likert scale: totally disagree, disagree, neutral, agree and totally agree. | immediately after finishing the intervention |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sivaporn Vongpipatana | Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21122742 | Background | Arneson CL, Durkin MS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Van Naarden Braun K, Doernberg NS. Prevalence of cerebral palsy: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, three sites, United States, 2004. Disabil Health J. 2009 Jan;2(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.08.001. | |
| 16437058 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
I plan to share the information about the result of the study with the statistician and some team members for the analysis. The sharing will not be linked to the patient identification.
within 3 months after harvesting the data
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002547 | Cerebral Palsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001925 | Brain Damage, Chronic |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The ABILHANDS-kids is the name of the test. It is not an unabbreviated name. The children will be asked the difficulty of doing their activities of daily living by using 21 questionnaires. The rating of difficulties were impossible, difficult and easy. Then the rating would be score as impossible=0, difficult=1 and easy = 2. The analysis of the score of there items will use the Rasch analysis which it is available online on http://rssandbox.iescagilly.be/\~abilhand-kids-cerebral-palsy-en.html. The minimum score means a worse outcome and the maximum score means the better outcome.
| before starting the intervention and after finishing the intervention within 1 week |
| EQ-5D-Y | The EQ-5D-Y is a questionnaire which has 2 parts for a participant to complete. There are 5 questions asking in first part: mobility, looking after myself, doing usual activities, having pain or discomfort and feelin worried, sad or unhappy. The participant needs to rate these questions in 3 rating score: no problem, with some problem or with a lot of problem. The rating score will be coded as no problem=1, with some problem = 1 and with a lot of problem = 2. The code 11111 is the best condition and the code 33333 is the worst condition. The second part of the questionnaire is the EQ-VAS which the participants need to rate their condition on the linear scale from 0-100. The worst condition is score 0 and the best condition is score 100.Then the coding from the first part will be converted as an index value. | before starting the intervention and after finishing the intervention within 1 week |
| Bhasin TK, Brocksen S, Avchen RN, Van Naarden Braun K. Prevalence of four developmental disabilities among children aged 8 years--Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 1996 and 2000. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Jan 27;55(1):1-9. |
| 16765723 | Background | Paneth N, Hong T, Korzeniewski S. The descriptive epidemiology of cerebral palsy. Clin Perinatol. 2006 Jun;33(2):251-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.03.011. |
| 12227618 | Background | Prevalence and characteristics of children with cerebral palsy in Europe. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Sep;44(9):633-40. |
| 24819682 | Background | Chen YP, Lee SY, Howard AM. Effect of virtual reality on upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Fall;26(3):289-300. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000046. |
| Background | Samia Abdel Rahman, Abdel Rahman, Afaf A. Shaheen. Virtual Reality Use in Motor Rehabilitation of Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research; 7 (1): 63-70. |
| 17895352 | Background | Chen YP, Kang LJ, Chuang TY, Doong JL, Lee SJ, Tsai MW, Jeng SF, Sung WH. Use of virtual reality to improve upper-extremity control in children with cerebral palsy: a single-subject design. Phys Ther. 2007 Nov;87(11):1441-57. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060062. Epub 2007 Sep 25. |
| 21978233 | Background | Green D, Wilson PH. Use of virtual reality in rehabilitation of movement in children with hemiplegia--a multiple case study evaluation. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(7):593-604. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.613520. Epub 2011 Oct 6. |
| Background | Pruksananonda C. Cerebral Palsy. In: Prasongjean P, editor. Cerebral Palsy Disease. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House; 2010. p. 1-3. |