Remineralizing Efficacy of Giomer Varnish vs. Fluoride Varnish in Management of White Spot Lesions in Adult Patients

Comparative Remineralizing Efficacy of Giomer Bioactive Barrier Varnish vs. Fluoride Varnish in Management of White Spot Lesions in Adult Patients: Randomized Controlled Tria

To evaluate the remineralizing capability of biosmart S-PRG barrier coat varnish and its employment in clinical practice

Inclusion Criteria:

• • Age range between 18 and 40 years.

  • Patients with no systemic diseases, syndromic abnormalities, or proven/suspected milk protein allergy and/or sensitivity
  • Patients with fair oral hygiene (mild to moderate plaque accumulation).
  • Patients with non-cavitated initial carious lesions grade 0 or 1 caries in accordance with The Nyvad caries diagnostic criteria.
  • The patient did not receive any remineralizing agent other than the regular toothpaste during the past three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

• • Severe or active periodontal disease.

  • Patients had received therapeutic irradiation to the head and neck region.
  • Patients had participated in a clinical trial within 6 months before commencement of this trial.
  • Patients unable to return for recall appointments
  • Presence of abnormal oral, medical, or mental condition.
  • Presence of dentin caries or enamel hypoplasia on maxillary anterior teeth.
  • Patients with glass ionomer restorations because the glass ionomer restoration release fluoride in the oral cavity, potentially impacting the results.