Simple Imaging Versus Standard Imaging Selection in Stroke Patients for Endovascular Treatment: the NO-SELECT Randomized Trial
Simple Imaging Versus Standard Imaging Selection in Stroke Patients for Endovascular Treatment: the NO-SELECT Randomized Trial
Several studies suggest that advanced multi-modal imaging with CTP should be used to screen late time window stroke patients for thrombectomy. However, NCCT is more accessible when comparing with CTP. It is unclear whether the NCCT-based ASPECTS can be used as an imaging criterion to screen patients for thrombectomy.
The newly published MR CLEAN-LATE and TENSION trials used NCCT or CTA, but still relied on ASPECTS scores to evaluate and select patients for endovascular therapy. However, different trials have different time windows. The aim of this trial was to assess the clinical outcomes of stroke patients with anterior large vessel occlusion who selected by simple imaging (NCCT) comparing via standard imaging screening strategy (CTP/MRI). The hypothesis is that simple imaging is non-inferior to standard imaging selection strategy in terms of achieving favorable outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China
neuro_depar@hotmail.com13966019211
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality 400037, China
qiuzhongmingdoctor@163.com13236599269
13631896333
zhenqiang.zhao@qq.com13976015677
shuyanglmc@163.com13915105260
18921150310@189.cn+8618921150310
869shenli@163.com18907982686
chenjiajin1983729@163.com18841180447